123 lines
8.7 KiB
Markdown
123 lines
8.7 KiB
Markdown
# Verification Results
|
||
|
||
| Document field | Value |
|
||
|---|---|
|
||
| Document | Verification Results |
|
||
| Project | BRN WMS |
|
||
| Project code | 200-WMS-26-001-00 |
|
||
| Title | Record of Verification Against Standard Requirements |
|
||
| Project period | 05/01/26–24/08/26 |
|
||
| Release | 17/08/26 V1.0 |
|
||
| Standard | ISO/IEC 29110 Basic Profile |
|
||
| Review round | Round 2 completed 17/08/26 — Round 2A document-control verification and Round 2B technical work-product verification |
|
||
| Organizer | Apirach Supattaratpateep (Project Manager), Noppong Chareunsook (System Analyst), Thanakorn Sathitwitayakul (Developer) |
|
||
| Round 2A verifier | Yaowalak Bangchomphoo — Document Control, independent of the document preparer |
|
||
| Round 2B technical reviewers | Noppong Chareunsook — System Analyst; Parin Ngamkham — QA / Tester; Apirach Supattaratpateep — Project Manager |
|
||
| Status | Final — Round 2 document-control and technical verification complete |
|
||
|
||
## Objective
|
||
|
||
Confirm the correctness and completeness of the SDLC work products against ISO/IEC 29110 Basic Profile document-control and technical work-product expectations before they are treated as ready for Project Sponsor review and authorization.
|
||
|
||
## 1. Deliverables under review
|
||
|
||
PM work products 1–10 and SI work products 11–20 (this and work product 22 are excluded, being the verification/validation records themselves).
|
||
|
||
## 2. Round 2A — Document-control verification
|
||
|
||
Each row checks the document-control header, content, project coverage, and approval block.
|
||
|
||
| ID | Work product | Header complete | Purpose met | Evidence basis disclosed | Approval block present | Result |
|
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||
| VR-01 | Statement of Work | Yes | Yes | N/A | Yes | Passed |
|
||
| VR-02 | Project Plan (Work Schedule, SPP, Customer Requirements) | Yes | Yes | Yes, where applicable | Yes | Passed |
|
||
| VR-03 | Progress Status Records (13) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
|
||
| VR-04 | Correction Register | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
|
||
| VR-05 | Acceptance Report | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
|
||
| VR-06 | Change Report (CH-001–CH-003) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
|
||
| VR-07 | Meeting Record (MTG-001–MTG-004) | Yes | Yes | Yes — each record discloses its evidence basis and marks unrecorded fields | Yes | Passed |
|
||
| VR-08 | Software Configuration | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
|
||
| VR-09 | Project Repository | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
|
||
| VR-10 | Project Repository (Backup) | Yes | Yes | Yes — backup sync and restoration verified manually by the Developer | Yes | Passed |
|
||
| VR-11 | Software Requirements Specification | Yes | Yes | Yes — scaling note explains granularity choice | Yes | Passed |
|
||
| VR-12 | Software Design | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
|
||
| VR-13 | Traceability Record | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
|
||
| VR-14 | Software Components | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
|
||
| VR-15 | Test Cases and Test Procedures | Yes | Yes | Yes — all 34 cases executed and passed 10/08/26–14/08/26 | Yes | Passed |
|
||
| VR-16 | Test Report | Yes | Yes | Yes — records 34 of 34 executed and passed 10/08/26–14/08/26 | Yes | Passed |
|
||
| VR-17 | Software | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
|
||
| VR-18 | Software User Documentation | Yes | Yes | N/A (forward-facing usage guide) | Yes | Passed |
|
||
| VR-19 | Product Operation Guide | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
|
||
| VR-20 | Maintenance Documentation | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
|
||
|
||
## 3. Round 2B — Technical work-product verification
|
||
|
||
| ID | Verification performed | Responsible reviewer | Result |
|
||
|---|---|---|---|
|
||
| TV-01 | Customer Requirements are complete, internally consistent, feasible within the agreed project scope, and expressed in a testable form. | Noppong Chareunsook — System Analyst | Passed |
|
||
| TV-02 | All 34 Customer Requirements resolve to valid SRS and Software Design references in the Traceability Record. | Noppong Chareunsook — System Analyst | Passed |
|
||
| TV-03 | Referenced software components and design units exist in delivered baseline `6c39700` and agree with the controlled Software Design and Software Components records. | Noppong Chareunsook — System Analyst; Parin Ngamkham — QA / Tester | Passed |
|
||
| TV-04 | All 34 test cases map to controlled requirements and contain defined inputs and expected results. | Parin Ngamkham — QA / Tester | Passed |
|
||
| TV-05 | Test totals reconcile across work products 13, 15, and 16: 34 defined, 34 executed, 34 passed, and no unresolved test anomaly reported. | Parin Ngamkham — QA / Tester | Passed |
|
||
| TV-06 | All 28 Correction Register entries resolve to valid implementation commits and applicable verification test-case references. | Parin Ngamkham — QA / Tester; Apirach Supattaratpateep — Project Manager | Passed |
|
||
| TV-07 | Traceability is complete from each approved requirement through SRS, design, test case, and recorded result; the stated coverage totals reconcile. | Noppong Chareunsook — System Analyst; Parin Ngamkham — QA / Tester | Passed |
|
||
| TV-08 | Software User Documentation, Product Operation Guide, and Maintenance Documentation agree with the delivered software scope, architecture, and controlled deployment approach. | Apirach Supattaratpateep — Project Manager; Noppong Chareunsook — System Analyst | Passed |
|
||
| TV-09 | No unresolved technical verification finding prevents the recorded acceptance decision. | Apirach Supattaratpateep — Project Manager | Passed |
|
||
|
||
## 4. Risk and constraint note
|
||
|
||
1. Round 1 was a self-review by the document preparer (the Developer). Round 2A was performed on 17/08/26 by Yaowalak Bangchomphoo, Document Control, who is independent of the Developer and whose assigned role covers identifiers, versions, approvals, distribution, repository content, and evidence — the attributes checked in Section 2.
|
||
2. Round 2B technical verification was performed by the assigned System Analyst, QA/Tester, and Project Manager. Noppong Chareunsook reviewed requirements, design, components, traceability, and technical documentation; Parin Ngamkham reviewed tests, correction references, components, and traceability; Apirach Supattaratpateep reviewed correction disposition, documentation agreement, and overall technical disposition.
|
||
3. All 34 functional/non-functional test cases and all 12 UAT/validation scenarios were executed over 10/08/26–14/08/26 and passed.
|
||
4. The test and validation baseline/evidence limitations are disclosed in work products 15, 16, and 22. Round 2B verifies the controlled records and their internal consistency; it does not create per-case observations or represent delivered baseline `6c39700` as the exact tested or validated build.
|
||
5. Per-item reviewer notes were not retained beyond the pass/fail results recorded above. Future reviews should retain those notes alongside each result so the basis of each verification decision is auditable and not only its outcome.
|
||
|
||
## 5. Recommendation
|
||
|
||
Retain per-item reviewer notes alongside the recorded results in future projects to strengthen the audit trail.
|
||
|
||
## 6. Reviewer declarations
|
||
|
||
By signing the applicable blocks below, the assigned reviewers confirm that they performed the Round 2 checks attributed to their roles, found the referenced work products consistent with the controlled project evidence, recorded the listed checks as Passed, and identified no unresolved verification finding affecting acceptance.
|
||
|
||
The Document Control signature confirms Round 2A. The System Analyst, QA/Tester, and Project Manager signatures confirm their respective Round 2B technical checks. The Project Sponsor signature authorizes the recorded verification disposition.
|
||
|
||
## 7. Approval
|
||
|
||
### Round 2A verified by
|
||
|
||
Name: Yaowalak Bangchomphoo
|
||
Role: Document Control
|
||
Signature: ______________________________________________
|
||
Date: ___________________________________________________
|
||
|
||
### Round 2B requirements, design, components, traceability, and technical documentation verified by
|
||
|
||
Name: Noppong Chareunsook
|
||
Role: System Analyst / Technical Reviewer
|
||
Signature: ______________________________________________
|
||
Date: ___________________________________________________
|
||
|
||
### Round 2B tests, corrections, components, and traceability verified by
|
||
|
||
Name: Parin Ngamkham
|
||
Role: QA / Tester
|
||
Signature: ______________________________________________
|
||
Date: ___________________________________________________
|
||
|
||
### Round 2B reviewed and dispositioned by
|
||
|
||
Name: Apirach Supattaratpateep
|
||
Role: Project Manager
|
||
Signature: ______________________________________________
|
||
Date: ___________________________________________________
|
||
|
||
### Reviewed and authorized by
|
||
|
||
Name: Seri Viriyasakultorn
|
||
Project roles: Project Sponsor / Customer Representative / Authorized Approver
|
||
Position: Managing Director
|
||
Company: B.R.N. Enterprise Co., Ltd.
|
||
Signature: ______________________________________________
|
||
Date: ___________________________________________________
|