85 lines
4.8 KiB
Markdown
85 lines
4.8 KiB
Markdown
# Verification Results
|
||
|
||
| Document field | Value |
|
||
|---|---|
|
||
| Document | Verification Results |
|
||
| Project | BRN WMS |
|
||
| Project code | 200-WMS-26-001-00 |
|
||
| Title | Record of Verification Against Standard Requirements |
|
||
| Project period | 05/01/26–24/08/26 |
|
||
| Release | 17/08/26 V1.0 |
|
||
| Standard | ISO/IEC 29110 Basic Profile |
|
||
| Review round | Round 2 completed — independent verification confirmed by the project user on 17/08/26 |
|
||
| Organizer | Apirach Supattaratpateep (Project Manager), Noppong Chareunsook (System Analyst), Thanakorn Sathitwitayakul (Developer) |
|
||
| Status | Final — independent verification and review completion confirmed by the project user |
|
||
|
||
## Objective
|
||
|
||
Confirm the correctness and completeness of the SDLC work products delivered so far, against ISO/IEC 29110 Basic Profile document-control expectations, before they are treated as ready for Project Sponsor review.
|
||
|
||
## 1. Deliverables under review
|
||
|
||
PM work products 1–10 and SI work products 11–20 (this and work product 22 are excluded from self-review, being the verification/validation records themselves).
|
||
|
||
## 2. Verification items
|
||
|
||
Each row checks the document-control header, content, project coverage, and approval block.
|
||
|
||
| ID | Work product | Header complete | Purpose met | Evidence basis disclosed | Approval block present | Result |
|
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||
| VR-01 | Statement of Work | Yes | Yes | N/A | Yes | Passed |
|
||
| VR-02 | Project Plan (Work Schedule, SPP, Customer Requirements) | Yes | Yes | Yes, where | Yes | Passed |
|
||
| VR-03 | Progress Status Records (13) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
|
||
| VR-04 | Correction Register | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
|
||
| VR-05 | Acceptance Report | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
|
||
| VR-06 | Change Report (CH-001–CH-003) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
|
||
| VR-08 | Software Configuration | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
|
||
| VR-09 | Project Repository | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
|
||
| VR-10 | Project Repository (Backup) | Yes | Yes | Yes — backup sync marked as developer-reported, not independently verified | Yes | Passed |
|
||
| VR-11 | Software Requirements Specification | Yes | Yes | Yes — scaling note explains granularity choice | Yes | Passed |
|
||
| VR-12 | Software Design | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
|
||
| VR-13 | Traceability Record | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
|
||
| VR-14 | Software Components | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
|
||
| VR-15 | Test Cases and Test Procedures | Yes | Yes | Yes — all 34 cases recorded as passed on execution | Yes | Passed |
|
||
| VR-16 | Test Report | Yes | Yes | Yes — records 34 of 34 passed on execution | Yes | Passed |
|
||
| VR-17 | Software | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
|
||
| VR-18 | Software User Documentation | Yes | Yes | N/A (forward-facing usage guide) | Yes | Passed |
|
||
| VR-19 | Product Operation Guide | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
|
||
| VR-20 | Maintenance Documentation | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
|
||
|
||
## 3. Risk and constraint note
|
||
|
||
1. Round 1 was a self-review by the document preparer. The project user confirmed that an independent Round 2 verification was completed on 17/08/26; the individual reviewer and detailed review record were not separately recorded.
|
||
2. Test execution, verification, and validation facilitation (work products 15, 16, 22) are now assigned to Parin Ngamkham, QA / Tester, independent of the Developer who prepared this record — added to the project 17/08/26. This mitigates the self-testing concern for those three work products specifically. A Document Control role (Yaowalak Bangchomphoo) was also added 17/08/26, but has not yet performed any independent document review — Round 1 of this record (this record and work products 1–14, 17–21) remains a self-review by the Developer who authored them. Whether Document Control's role should include reviewing this document set going forward is a scope decision for the user, not assumed here.
|
||
3. All 34 functional/non-functional test cases and all 12 UAT/validation scenarios completed and passed.
|
||
4. Future reviews should retain the named independent reviewer and approval record.
|
||
|
||
## 4. Recommendation
|
||
|
||
Retain the recorded confirmation and capture named reviewer/signature evidence in future projects.
|
||
|
||
## 5. Approval
|
||
|
||
### Prepared by
|
||
|
||
Name: Thanakorn Sathitwitayakul
|
||
Role: Developer
|
||
Signature: ______________________________________________
|
||
Date: ___________________________________________________
|
||
|
||
### Reviewed by
|
||
|
||
Name: Apirach Supattaratpateep
|
||
Role: Project Manager
|
||
Signature: ______________________________________________
|
||
Date: ___________________________________________________
|
||
|
||
### Reviewed and authorized by
|
||
|
||
Name: Seri Viriyasakultorn
|
||
Project roles: Project Sponsor / Customer Representative / Authorized Approver
|
||
Position: Managing Director
|
||
Company: B.R.N. Enterprise Co., Ltd.
|
||
Signature: ______________________________________________
|
||
Date: ___________________________________________________
|