5.3 KiB
Verification Results
| Document field | Value |
|---|---|
| Document | Verification Results |
| Project | BRN WMS |
| Project code | 200-WMS-26-001-00 |
| Title | Record of Verification Against Standard Requirements |
| Project period | 05/01/26–24/08/26 |
| Release | 17/08/26 V1.0 |
| Standard | ISO/IEC 29110 Basic Profile |
| Review round | Round 2 completed 17/08/26 — independent verification performed by Yaowalak Bangchomphoo, Document Control |
| Organizer | Apirach Supattaratpateep (Project Manager), Noppong Chareunsook (System Analyst), Thanakorn Sathitwitayakul (Developer) |
| Round 2 verifier | Yaowalak Bangchomphoo — Document Control, independent of the document preparer |
| Status | Final — Round 2 independent verification complete |
Objective
Confirm the correctness and completeness of the SDLC work products delivered so far, against ISO/IEC 29110 Basic Profile document-control expectations, before they are treated as ready for Project Sponsor review.
1. Deliverables under review
PM work products 1–10 and SI work products 11–20 (this and work product 22 are excluded, being the verification/validation records themselves).
2. Verification items
Each row checks the document-control header, content, project coverage, and approval block.
| ID | Work product | Header complete | Purpose met | Evidence basis disclosed | Approval block present | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VR-01 | Statement of Work | Yes | Yes | N/A | Yes | Passed |
| VR-02 | Project Plan (Work Schedule, SPP, Customer Requirements) | Yes | Yes | Yes, where applicable | Yes | Passed |
| VR-03 | Progress Status Records (13) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-04 | Correction Register | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-05 | Acceptance Report | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-06 | Change Report (CH-001–CH-003) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-07 | Meeting Record (MTG-001–MTG-004) | Yes | Yes | Yes — each record discloses its evidence basis and marks unrecorded fields | Yes | Passed |
| VR-08 | Software Configuration | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-09 | Project Repository | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-10 | Project Repository (Backup) | Yes | Yes | Yes — backup sync and restoration verified manually by the Developer | Yes | Passed |
| VR-11 | Software Requirements Specification | Yes | Yes | Yes — scaling note explains granularity choice | Yes | Passed |
| VR-12 | Software Design | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-13 | Traceability Record | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-14 | Software Components | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-15 | Test Cases and Test Procedures | Yes | Yes | Yes — all 34 cases executed and passed 10/08/26–14/08/26 | Yes | Passed |
| VR-16 | Test Report | Yes | Yes | Yes — records 34 of 34 executed and passed 10/08/26–14/08/26 | Yes | Passed |
| VR-17 | Software | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-18 | Software User Documentation | Yes | Yes | N/A (forward-facing usage guide) | Yes | Passed |
| VR-19 | Product Operation Guide | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-20 | Maintenance Documentation | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
3. Risk and constraint note
- Round 1 was a self-review by the document preparer (the Developer). Round 2 was performed on 17/08/26 by Yaowalak Bangchomphoo, Document Control, who is independent of the Developer and whose assigned role covers identifiers, versions, approvals, distribution, repository content, and evidence — the same attributes the verification items in Section 2 check. Per-item reviewer notes were not retained beyond the pass/fail results recorded above.
- Test execution, verification, and validation facilitation (work products 15, 16, 22) are now assigned to Parin Ngamkham, QA / Tester, independent of the Developer who prepared this record. This mitigates the self-testing concern for those three work products specifically. Round 1 of this record and of work products 1–14 and 17–21 was a self-review by the Developer who authored them; that self-review was superseded by the Round 2 independent verification performed by Document Control on 17/08/26.
- All 34 functional/non-functional test cases and all 12 UAT/validation scenarios were executed over 10/08/26–14/08/26 and passed.
- Future reviews should retain per-item reviewer notes alongside the pass/fail result, so the basis of each verification decision is auditable and not only its outcome.
4. Recommendation
Retain per-item reviewer notes alongside the recorded results in future projects to strengthen the audit trail.
5. Approval
Prepared by (Round 2 independent verification)
Name: Yaowalak Bangchomphoo
Role: Document Control
Signature: ______________________________________________
Date: ___________________________________________________
Reviewed by
Name: Apirach Supattaratpateep
Role: Project Manager
Signature: ______________________________________________
Date: ___________________________________________________
Reviewed and authorized by
Name: Seri Viriyasakultorn
Project roles: Project Sponsor / Customer Representative / Authorized Approver
Position: Managing Director
Company: B.R.N. Enterprise Co., Ltd.
Signature: ______________________________________________
Date: ___________________________________________________