4.8 KiB
Verification Results
| Document field | Value |
|---|---|
| Document | Verification Results |
| Project | BRN WMS |
| Project code | 200-WMS-26-001-00 |
| Title | Record of Verification Against Standard Requirements |
| Project period | 05/01/26–24/08/26 |
| Release | 17/08/26 V1.0 |
| Standard | ISO/IEC 29110 Basic Profile |
| Review round | Round 2 completed — independent verification confirmed by the project user on 17/08/26 |
| Organizer | Apirach Supattaratpateep (Project Manager), Noppong Chareunsook (System Analyst), Thanakorn Sathitwitayakul (Developer) |
| Status | Final — independent verification and review completion confirmed by the project user |
Objective
Confirm the correctness and completeness of the SDLC work products delivered so far, against ISO/IEC 29110 Basic Profile document-control expectations, before they are treated as ready for Project Sponsor review.
1. Deliverables under review
PM work products 1–10 and SI work products 11–20 (this and work product 22 are excluded from self-review, being the verification/validation records themselves).
2. Verification items
Each row checks the document-control header, content, project coverage, and approval block.
| ID | Work product | Header complete | Purpose met | Evidence basis disclosed | Approval block present | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VR-01 | Statement of Work | Yes | Yes | N/A | Yes | Passed |
| VR-02 | Project Plan (Work Schedule, SPP, Customer Requirements) | Yes | Yes | Yes, where | Yes | Passed |
| VR-03 | Progress Status Records (13) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-04 | Correction Register | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-05 | Acceptance Report | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-06 | Change Report (CH-001–CH-003) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-08 | Software Configuration | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-09 | Project Repository | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-10 | Project Repository (Backup) | Yes | Yes | Yes — backup sync marked as developer-reported, not independently verified | Yes | Passed |
| VR-11 | Software Requirements Specification | Yes | Yes | Yes — scaling note explains granularity choice | Yes | Passed |
| VR-12 | Software Design | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-13 | Traceability Record | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-14 | Software Components | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-15 | Test Cases and Test Procedures | Yes | Yes | Yes — all 34 cases recorded as passed on execution | Yes | Passed |
| VR-16 | Test Report | Yes | Yes | Yes — records 34 of 34 passed on execution | Yes | Passed |
| VR-17 | Software | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-18 | Software User Documentation | Yes | Yes | N/A (forward-facing usage guide) | Yes | Passed |
| VR-19 | Product Operation Guide | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-20 | Maintenance Documentation | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
3. Risk and constraint note
- Round 1 was a self-review by the document preparer. The project user confirmed that an independent Round 2 verification was completed on 17/08/26; the individual reviewer and detailed review record were not separately recorded.
- Test execution, verification, and validation facilitation (work products 15, 16, 22) are now assigned to Parin Ngamkham, QA / Tester, independent of the Developer who prepared this record — added to the project 17/08/26. This mitigates the self-testing concern for those three work products specifically. A Document Control role (Yaowalak Bangchomphoo) was also added 17/08/26, but has not yet performed any independent document review — Round 1 of this record (this record and work products 1–14, 17–21) remains a self-review by the Developer who authored them. Whether Document Control's role should include reviewing this document set going forward is a scope decision for the user, not assumed here.
- All 34 functional/non-functional test cases and all 12 UAT/validation scenarios completed and passed.
- Future reviews should retain the named independent reviewer and approval record.
4. Recommendation
Retain the recorded confirmation and capture named reviewer/signature evidence in future projects.
5. Approval
Prepared by
Name: Thanakorn Sathitwitayakul
Role: Developer
Signature: ______________________________________________
Date: ___________________________________________________
Reviewed by
Name: Apirach Supattaratpateep
Role: Project Manager
Signature: ______________________________________________
Date: ___________________________________________________
Reviewed and authorized by
Name: Seri Viriyasakultorn
Project roles: Project Sponsor / Customer Representative / Authorized Approver
Position: Managing Director
Company: B.R.N. Enterprise Co., Ltd.
Signature: ______________________________________________
Date: ___________________________________________________