5.9 KiB
Verification Results
| Document field | Value |
|---|---|
| Document | Verification Results |
| Project | BRN WMS |
| Project code | 200-WMS-26-001-00 |
| Title | บันทึกการตรวจสอบตามข้อกำหนดของมาตรฐาน |
| Project period | 05/01/26–24/08/26 |
| Preparation date | 17/08/26 |
| Release | 17/08/26 V1.0 |
| Standard | ISO/IEC 29110 Basic Profile |
| Review round | Round 2 completed — independent verification confirmed retrospectively by the project user on 17/08/26 |
| Organizer | คุณอภิรัชต์ สุภัทรประทีป (Project Manager), ธนกร สถิตวิทยากุล (Developer / System Analyst) |
| Status | Final — independent verification and review completion confirmed retrospectively by the project user |
Objective (วัตถุประสงค์)
Confirm the correctness and completeness of the SDLC work products delivered so far, against ISO/IEC 29110 Basic Profile document-control expectations, before they are treated as ready for Project Sponsor review.
1. Deliverables under review
PM work products 1–10 and SI work products 11–20 (this and work product 22 are excluded from self-review, being the verification/validation records themselves).
2. Verification items
Each row checks: (a) the document-control header table is present and complete, (b) the document's content matches its ISO 29110 purpose, (c) the evidence basis is disclosed where the content is reconstructed, (d) a three-tier approval block (Developer/PM/Sponsor, or equivalent) is present.
| ID | Work product | Header complete | Purpose met | Evidence basis disclosed | Approval block present | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VR-01 | Statement of Work | Yes | Yes | N/A (contemporaneous) | Yes | Passed |
| VR-02 | Project Plan (Work Schedule, SPP, Customer Requirements) | Yes | Yes | Yes, where reconstructed | Yes | Passed |
| VR-03 | Progress Status Records (13) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-04 | Correction Register | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-05 | Acceptance Report | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-06 | Change Report (CH-001–CH-004) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-07 | Meeting Record (MTG-001–MTG-004) | Yes | Yes | Yes — explicitly discloses no meeting occurred | Yes | Passed |
| VR-08 | Software Configuration | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-09 | Project Repository | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-10 | Project Repository (Backup) | Yes | Yes | Yes — backup sync marked as developer-reported, not independently verified | Yes | Passed |
| VR-11 | Software Requirements Specification | Yes | Yes | Yes — scaling note explains granularity choice | Yes | Passed |
| VR-12 | Software Design | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-13 | Traceability Record | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-14 | Software Components | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-15 | Test Cases and Test Procedures | Yes | Yes | Yes — all 34 cases recorded as passed on user-confirmed retrospective execution | Yes | Passed |
| VR-16 | Test Report | Yes | Yes | Yes — records 34 of 34 passed on user-confirmed retrospective execution | Yes | Passed |
| VR-17 | Software | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-18 | Software User Documentation | Yes | Yes | N/A (forward-facing usage guide) | Yes | Passed |
| VR-19 | Product Operation Guide | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-20 | Maintenance Documentation | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
3. Risk and constraint note
- Round 1 was a self-review by the document preparer. The project user confirmed that an independent Round 2 verification was completed retrospectively on 17/08/26; the individual reviewer and detailed review record were not separately recorded.
- Test execution, verification, and validation facilitation (work products 15, 16, 22) are now assigned to ปริญ งามขำ, QA / Tester, independent of the Developer / System Analyst who prepared this record — added to the project 17/08/26. This mitigates the self-testing concern for those three work products specifically. A Document Control role (คุณเยาวลักษณ์ บางชมภู) was also added 17/08/26, but has not yet performed any independent document review — Round 1 of this record (this record and work products 1–14, 17–21) remains a self-review by the Developer / System Analyst who authored them. Whether Document Control's role should include reviewing this document set going forward is a scope decision for the user, not assumed here.
- The project user also confirmed all 34 functional/non-functional test cases and all 12 UAT/validation scenarios completed and passed. These results are retrospective user-confirmed evidence, not inferred from Git history.
- Future reviews should retain the named independent reviewer and contemporaneous approval record.
4. Recommendation
Retain the recorded retrospective confirmation and capture named reviewer/signature evidence in future projects.
5. Approval
Prepared by
Name: ธนกร สถิตวิทยากุล
Role: Developer / System Analyst
Signature: ______________________________________________
Date: ___________________________________________________
Reviewed by
Name: คุณอภิรัชต์ สุภัทรประทีป
Role: Project Manager
Signature: ______________________________________________
Date: ___________________________________________________
Reviewed and authorized by
Name: คุณเสรี วิริยะสกุลธรณ์
Project roles: Project Sponsor / Customer Representative / Authorized Approver
Position: กรรมการผู้จัดการ
Company: บริษัท บี.อาร์.เอ็น. เอ็นเตอร์ไพรส์ จำกัด
Signature: ______________________________________________
Date: ___________________________________________________