# Verification Results

| Document field | Value |
|---|---|
| Document | Verification Results |
| Project | BRN WMS |
| Project code | 200-WMS-26-001-00 |
| Title | Record of Verification Against Standard Requirements |
| Project period | 05/01/26–24/08/26 |
| Release | 17/08/26 V1.0 |
| Standard | ISO/IEC 29110 Basic Profile |
| Review round | Round 2 completed 17/08/26 — Round 2A document-control verification and Round 2B technical work-product verification |
| Organizer | Apirach Supattaratpateep (Project Manager), Noppong Chareunsook (System Analyst), Thanakorn Sathitwitayakul (Developer) |
| Round 2A verifier | Yaowalak Bangchomphoo — Document Control, independent of the document preparer |
| Round 2B technical reviewers | Noppong Chareunsook — System Analyst; Parin Ngamkham — QA / Tester; Apirach Supattaratpateep — Project Manager |
| Status | Final — Round 2 document-control and technical verification complete |

## Objective

Confirm the correctness and completeness of the SDLC work products against ISO/IEC 29110 Basic Profile document-control and technical work-product expectations before they are treated as ready for Project Sponsor review and authorization.

## 1. Deliverables under review

PM work products 1–10 and SI work products 11–20 (this and work product 22 are excluded, being the verification/validation records themselves).

## 2. Round 2A — Document-control verification

Each row checks the document-control header, content, project coverage, and approval block.

| ID | Work product | Header complete | Purpose met | Evidence basis disclosed | Approval block present | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VR-01 | Statement of Work | Yes | Yes | N/A | Yes | Passed |
| VR-02 | Project Plan (Work Schedule, SPP, Customer Requirements) | Yes | Yes | Yes, where applicable | Yes | Passed |
| VR-03 | Progress Status Records (13) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-04 | Correction Register | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-05 | Acceptance Report | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-06 | Change Report (CH-001–CH-003) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-07 | Meeting Record (MTG-001–MTG-004) | Yes | Yes | Yes — each record discloses its evidence basis and marks unrecorded fields | Yes | Passed |
| VR-08 | Software Configuration | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-09 | Project Repository | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-10 | Project Repository (Backup) | Yes | Yes | Yes — backup sync and restoration verified manually by the Developer | Yes | Passed |
| VR-11 | Software Requirements Specification | Yes | Yes | Yes — scaling note explains granularity choice | Yes | Passed |
| VR-12 | Software Design | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-13 | Traceability Record | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-14 | Software Components | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-15 | Test Cases and Test Procedures | Yes | Yes | Yes — all 34 cases executed and passed 10/08/26–14/08/26 | Yes | Passed |
| VR-16 | Test Report | Yes | Yes | Yes — records 34 of 34 executed and passed 10/08/26–14/08/26 | Yes | Passed |
| VR-17 | Software | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-18 | Software User Documentation | Yes | Yes | N/A (forward-facing usage guide) | Yes | Passed |
| VR-19 | Product Operation Guide | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-20 | Maintenance Documentation | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |

## 3. Round 2B — Technical work-product verification

| ID | Verification performed | Responsible reviewer | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| TV-01 | Customer Requirements are complete, internally consistent, feasible within the agreed project scope, and expressed in a testable form. | Noppong Chareunsook — System Analyst | Passed |
| TV-02 | All 34 Customer Requirements resolve to valid SRS and Software Design references in the Traceability Record. | Noppong Chareunsook — System Analyst | Passed |
| TV-03 | Referenced software components and design units exist in delivered baseline `6c39700` and agree with the controlled Software Design and Software Components records. | Noppong Chareunsook — System Analyst; Parin Ngamkham — QA / Tester | Passed |
| TV-04 | All 34 test cases map to controlled requirements and contain defined inputs and expected results. | Parin Ngamkham — QA / Tester | Passed |
| TV-05 | Test totals reconcile across work products 13, 15, and 16: 34 defined, 34 executed, 34 passed, and no unresolved test anomaly reported. | Parin Ngamkham — QA / Tester | Passed |
| TV-06 | All 28 Correction Register entries resolve to valid implementation commits and applicable verification test-case references. | Parin Ngamkham — QA / Tester; Apirach Supattaratpateep — Project Manager | Passed |
| TV-07 | Traceability is complete from each approved requirement through SRS, design, test case, and recorded result; the stated coverage totals reconcile. | Noppong Chareunsook — System Analyst; Parin Ngamkham — QA / Tester | Passed |
| TV-08 | Software User Documentation, Product Operation Guide, and Maintenance Documentation agree with the delivered software scope, architecture, and controlled deployment approach. | Apirach Supattaratpateep — Project Manager; Noppong Chareunsook — System Analyst | Passed |
| TV-09 | No unresolved technical verification finding prevents the recorded acceptance decision. | Apirach Supattaratpateep — Project Manager | Passed |

## 4. Risk and constraint note

1. Round 1 was a self-review by the document preparer (the Developer). Round 2A was performed on 17/08/26 by Yaowalak Bangchomphoo, Document Control, who is independent of the Developer and whose assigned role covers identifiers, versions, approvals, distribution, repository content, and evidence — the attributes checked in Section 2.
2. Round 2B technical verification was performed by the assigned System Analyst, QA/Tester, and Project Manager. Noppong Chareunsook reviewed requirements, design, components, traceability, and technical documentation; Parin Ngamkham reviewed tests, correction references, components, and traceability; Apirach Supattaratpateep reviewed correction disposition, documentation agreement, and overall technical disposition.
3. All 34 functional/non-functional test cases and all 12 UAT/validation scenarios were executed over 10/08/26–14/08/26 and passed.
4. The test and validation baseline/evidence limitations are disclosed in work products 15, 16, and 22. Round 2B verifies the controlled records and their internal consistency; it does not create per-case observations or represent delivered baseline `6c39700` as the exact tested or validated build.
5. Per-item reviewer notes were not retained beyond the pass/fail results recorded above. Future reviews should retain those notes alongside each result so the basis of each verification decision is auditable and not only its outcome.

## 5. Recommendation

Retain per-item reviewer notes alongside the recorded results in future projects to strengthen the audit trail.

## 6. Reviewer declarations

By signing the applicable blocks below, the assigned reviewers confirm that they performed the Round 2 checks attributed to their roles, found the referenced work products consistent with the controlled project evidence, recorded the listed checks as Passed, and identified no unresolved verification finding affecting acceptance.

The Document Control signature confirms Round 2A. The System Analyst, QA/Tester, and Project Manager signatures confirm their respective Round 2B technical checks. The Project Sponsor signature authorizes the recorded verification disposition.

## 7. Approval

### Round 2A verified by

Name: Yaowalak Bangchomphoo  
Role: Document Control
Signature: ______________________________________________  
Date: ___________________________________________________

### Round 2B requirements, design, components, traceability, and technical documentation verified by

Name: Noppong Chareunsook  
Role: System Analyst / Technical Reviewer  
Signature: ______________________________________________  
Date: ___________________________________________________

### Round 2B tests, corrections, components, and traceability verified by

Name: Parin Ngamkham  
Role: QA / Tester  
Signature: ______________________________________________  
Date: ___________________________________________________

### Round 2B reviewed and dispositioned by

Name: Apirach Supattaratpateep  
Role: Project Manager  
Signature: ______________________________________________  
Date: ___________________________________________________

### Reviewed and authorized by

Name: Seri Viriyasakultorn  
Project roles: Project Sponsor / Customer Representative / Authorized Approver  
Position: Managing Director  
Company: B.R.N. Enterprise Co., Ltd.  
Signature: ______________________________________________  
Date: ___________________________________________________