# Verification Results

| Document field | Value |
|---|---|
| Document | Verification Results |
| Project | BRN WMS |
| Project code | 200-WMS-26-001-00 |
| Title | บันทึกการตรวจสอบตามข้อกำหนดของมาตรฐาน |
| Project period | 05/01/26–24/08/26 |
| Preparation date | 17/08/26 |
| Release | 17/08/26 V1.0 |
| Standard | ISO/IEC 29110 Basic Profile |
| Review round | Round 2 completed — independent verification confirmed retrospectively by the project user on 17/08/26 |
| Organizer | คุณอภิรัชต์ สุภัทรประทีป (Project Manager), ธนกร สถิตวิทยากุล (Developer / System Analyst) |
| Status | Final — independent verification and review completion confirmed retrospectively by the project user |

## Objective (วัตถุประสงค์)

Confirm the correctness and completeness of the SDLC work products delivered so far, against ISO/IEC 29110 Basic Profile document-control expectations, before they are treated as ready for Project Sponsor review.

## 1. Deliverables under review

PM work products 1–10 and SI work products 11–20 (this and work product 22 are excluded from self-review, being the verification/validation records themselves).

## 2. Verification items

Each row checks: (a) the document-control header table is present and complete, (b) the document's content matches its ISO 29110 purpose, (c) the evidence basis is disclosed where the content is reconstructed, (d) a three-tier approval block (Developer/PM/Sponsor, or equivalent) is present.

| ID | Work product | Header complete | Purpose met | Evidence basis disclosed | Approval block present | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VR-01 | Statement of Work | Yes | Yes | N/A (contemporaneous) | Yes | Passed |
| VR-02 | Project Plan (Work Schedule, SPP, Customer Requirements) | Yes | Yes | Yes, where reconstructed | Yes | Passed |
| VR-03 | Progress Status Records (13) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-04 | Correction Register | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-05 | Acceptance Report | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-06 | Change Report (CH-001–CH-004) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-07 | Meeting Record (MTG-001–MTG-004) | Yes | Yes | Yes — explicitly discloses no meeting occurred | Yes | Passed |
| VR-08 | Software Configuration | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-09 | Project Repository | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-10 | Project Repository (Backup) | Yes | Yes | Yes — backup sync marked as developer-reported, not independently verified | Yes | Passed |
| VR-11 | Software Requirements Specification | Yes | Yes | Yes — scaling note explains granularity choice | Yes | Passed |
| VR-12 | Software Design | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-13 | Traceability Record | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-14 | Software Components | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-15 | Test Cases and Test Procedures | Yes | Yes | Yes — all 34 cases recorded as passed on user-confirmed retrospective execution | Yes | Passed |
| VR-16 | Test Report | Yes | Yes | Yes — records 34 of 34 passed on user-confirmed retrospective execution | Yes | Passed |
| VR-17 | Software | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-18 | Software User Documentation | Yes | Yes | N/A (forward-facing usage guide) | Yes | Passed |
| VR-19 | Product Operation Guide | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-20 | Maintenance Documentation | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |

## 3. Risk and constraint note

1. Round 1 was a self-review by the document preparer. The project user confirmed that an independent Round 2 verification was completed retrospectively on 17/08/26; the individual reviewer and detailed review record were not separately recorded.
2. Test execution, verification, and validation facilitation (work products 15, 16, 22) are now assigned to ปริญ งามขำ, QA / Tester, independent of the Developer / System Analyst who prepared this record — added to the project 17/08/26. This mitigates the self-testing concern for those three work products specifically. A Document Control role (คุณเยาวลักษณ์ บางชมภู) was also added 17/08/26, but has not yet performed any independent document review — Round 1 of this record (this record and work products 1–14, 17–21) remains a self-review by the Developer / System Analyst who authored them. Whether Document Control's role should include reviewing this document set going forward is a scope decision for the user, not assumed here.
3. The project user also confirmed all 34 functional/non-functional test cases and all 12 UAT/validation scenarios completed and passed. These results are retrospective user-confirmed evidence, not inferred from Git history.
4. Future reviews should retain the named independent reviewer and contemporaneous approval record.

## 4. Recommendation

Retain the recorded retrospective confirmation and capture named reviewer/signature evidence in future projects.

## 5. Approval

### Prepared by

Name: ธนกร สถิตวิทยากุล  
Role: Developer / System Analyst  
Signature: ______________________________________________  
Date: ___________________________________________________

### Reviewed by

Name: คุณอภิรัชต์ สุภัทรประทีป  
Role: Project Manager  
Signature: ______________________________________________  
Date: ___________________________________________________

### Reviewed and authorized by

Name: คุณเสรี วิริยะสกุลธรณ์  
Project roles: Project Sponsor / Customer Representative / Authorized Approver  
Position: กรรมการผู้จัดการ  
Company: บริษัท บี.อาร์.เอ็น. เอ็นเตอร์ไพรส์ จำกัด  
Signature: ______________________________________________  
Date: ___________________________________________________