# Verification Results

| Document field | Value |
|---|---|
| Document | Verification Results |
| Project | BRN WMS |
| Project code | 200-WMS-26-001-00 |
| Title | Record of Verification Against Standard Requirements |
| Project period | 05/01/26–24/08/26 |
| Release | 17/08/26 V1.0 |
| Standard | ISO/IEC 29110 Basic Profile |
| Review round | Round 2 completed 17/08/26 — independent verification performed by Yaowalak Bangchomphoo, Document Control |
| Organizer | Apirach Supattaratpateep (Project Manager), Noppong Chareunsook (System Analyst), Thanakorn Sathitwitayakul (Developer) |
| Round 2 verifier | Yaowalak Bangchomphoo — Document Control, independent of the document preparer |
| Status | Final — Round 2 independent verification complete |

## Objective

Confirm the correctness and completeness of the SDLC work products delivered so far, against ISO/IEC 29110 Basic Profile document-control expectations, before they are treated as ready for Project Sponsor review.

## 1. Deliverables under review

PM work products 1–10 and SI work products 11–20 (this and work product 22 are excluded, being the verification/validation records themselves).

## 2. Verification items

Each row checks the document-control header, content, project coverage, and approval block.

| ID | Work product | Header complete | Purpose met | Evidence basis disclosed | Approval block present | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VR-01 | Statement of Work | Yes | Yes | N/A | Yes | Passed |
| VR-02 | Project Plan (Work Schedule, SPP, Customer Requirements) | Yes | Yes | Yes, where applicable | Yes | Passed |
| VR-03 | Progress Status Records (13) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-04 | Correction Register | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-05 | Acceptance Report | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-06 | Change Report (CH-001–CH-003) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-07 | Meeting Record (MTG-001–MTG-004) | Yes | Yes | Yes — each record discloses its evidence basis and marks unrecorded fields | Yes | Passed |
| VR-08 | Software Configuration | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-09 | Project Repository | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-10 | Project Repository (Backup) | Yes | Yes | Yes — backup sync and restoration verified manually by the Developer | Yes | Passed |
| VR-11 | Software Requirements Specification | Yes | Yes | Yes — scaling note explains granularity choice | Yes | Passed |
| VR-12 | Software Design | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-13 | Traceability Record | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-14 | Software Components | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-15 | Test Cases and Test Procedures | Yes | Yes | Yes — all 34 cases executed and passed 10/08/26–14/08/26 | Yes | Passed |
| VR-16 | Test Report | Yes | Yes | Yes — records 34 of 34 executed and passed 10/08/26–14/08/26 | Yes | Passed |
| VR-17 | Software | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-18 | Software User Documentation | Yes | Yes | N/A (forward-facing usage guide) | Yes | Passed |
| VR-19 | Product Operation Guide | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-20 | Maintenance Documentation | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |

## 3. Risk and constraint note

1. Round 1 was a self-review by the document preparer (the Developer). Round 2 was performed on 17/08/26 by Yaowalak Bangchomphoo, Document Control, who is independent of the Developer and whose assigned role covers identifiers, versions, approvals, distribution, repository content, and evidence — the same attributes the verification items in Section 2 check. Per-item reviewer notes were not retained beyond the pass/fail results recorded above.
2. Test execution, verification, and validation facilitation (work products 15, 16, 22) are now assigned to Parin Ngamkham, QA / Tester, independent of the Developer who prepared this record. This mitigates the self-testing concern for those three work products specifically. Round 1 of this record and of work products 1–14 and 17–21 was a self-review by the Developer who authored them; that self-review was superseded by the Round 2 independent verification performed by Document Control on 17/08/26.
3. All 34 functional/non-functional test cases and all 12 UAT/validation scenarios were executed over 10/08/26–14/08/26 and passed.
4. Future reviews should retain per-item reviewer notes alongside the pass/fail result, so the basis of each verification decision is auditable and not only its outcome.

## 4. Recommendation

Capture the Round 2 verifier's signature on this record, and retain per-item review notes in future projects.

## 5. Approval

### Prepared by (Round 2 independent verification)

Name: Yaowalak Bangchomphoo  
Role: Document Control
Signature: ______________________________________________  
Date: ___________________________________________________

### Reviewed by

Name: Apirach Supattaratpateep  
Role: Project Manager  
Signature: ______________________________________________  
Date: ___________________________________________________

### Reviewed and authorized by

Name: Seri Viriyasakultorn  
Project roles: Project Sponsor / Customer Representative / Authorized Approver  
Position: Managing Director  
Company: B.R.N. Enterprise Co., Ltd.  
Signature: ______________________________________________  
Date: ___________________________________________________