SDLC docs
This commit is contained in:
Thanakorn
+84
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
|
||||
# Progress Status Record 1 of 13
|
||||
|
||||
| Document field | Value |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Document | Progress Status Record |
|
||||
| Project | BRN WMS |
|
||||
| Project code | 200-WMS-26-001-00 |
|
||||
| Reporting period | 05/01/26–23/01/26 |
|
||||
| Report date | 23/01/26 |
|
||||
| Actual preparation date | 17/08/26 |
|
||||
| Release | 23/01/26 V1.0 Final |
|
||||
| Prepared by | คุณอภิรัชต์ สุภัทรประทีป — Project Manager |
|
||||
| Technical evidence | ธนกร สถิตวิทยากุล — Developer / System Analyst |
|
||||
| Status | Final — ready for review and authorization |
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Retrospective-record disclosure
|
||||
|
||||
This record was prepared retrospectively on 17/08/26. It covers the historical reporting period shown above and does not claim to have been authored or committed on the historical report date. Statements are limited to the evidence classification and references identified below.
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Period objective
|
||||
|
||||
**Milestone:** Project initiation
|
||||
|
||||
**Planned outcome:** Establish the project need, stakeholders, objectives, scope, and authority.
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Task progress
|
||||
|
||||
**Period summary:** Formal project start and scope boundary were established retrospectively from the agreed lifecycle.
|
||||
|
||||
| Task ID | Task | Planned finish | Actual / evidence date | Completion | Evidence | Status |
|
||||
|---|---|---:|---:|---:|---|---|
|
||||
| 1.1 | Identify project need | 09/01/26 | 09/01/26 | 100% | Statement of Work | Reconstructed completed |
|
||||
| 1.2 | Identify stakeholders and objectives | 16/01/26 | 16/01/26 | 100% | Project role confirmation | Reconstructed completed |
|
||||
| 1.3 | Approve project scope | 23/01/26 | Pending signature | 90% | Statement of Work V1.0 Final | Approval pending |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
| Evidence field | Value |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Evidence classification | Agreed reconstructed |
|
||||
| Evidence reference | Statement of Work; Work Schedule |
|
||||
| Overall period status | Not rated — reconstructed |
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Schedule status
|
||||
|
||||
Work is assessed against the agreed project boundaries of 05/01/26–14/08/26. No unsupported numeric variance is asserted for this period. Where the evidence is reconstructed, schedule status remains explicitly unrated rather than represented as contemporaneously measured.
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. Issues, risks, and corrective action
|
||||
|
||||
**Issue or risk:** Historical initiation records were not created contemporaneously.
|
||||
|
||||
**Control:** Preserve the stated evidence basis, link applicable defects to the Correction Register, update traceability and tests, and obtain the required review or authorization without backdating records or signatures.
|
||||
|
||||
## 6. Changes
|
||||
|
||||
Technical commits in this period are implementation evidence. They must be classified separately as in-scope implementation, defect correction, or an authorized baseline change before being entered in the Change Report.
|
||||
|
||||
## 7. Next-period plan
|
||||
|
||||
Complete customer requirements and project planning baseline.
|
||||
|
||||
## 8. Approval
|
||||
|
||||
### Prepared by
|
||||
|
||||
Name: คุณอภิรัชต์ สุภัทรประทีป
|
||||
Role: Project Manager
|
||||
Signature: ______________________________________________
|
||||
Date: ___________________________________________________
|
||||
|
||||
### Technical evidence provided by
|
||||
|
||||
Name: ธนกร สถิตวิทยากุล
|
||||
Role: Developer / System Analyst
|
||||
Signature: ______________________________________________
|
||||
Date: ___________________________________________________
|
||||
|
||||
### Reviewed and authorized by
|
||||
|
||||
Name: คุณเสรี วิริยะสกุลธรณ์
|
||||
Project roles: Project Sponsor / Customer Representative / Authorized Approver
|
||||
Position: กรรมการผู้จัดการ
|
||||
Company: บริษัท บี.อาร์.เอ็น. เอ็นเตอร์ไพรส์ จำกัด
|
||||
Signature: ______________________________________________
|
||||
Date: ___________________________________________________
|
||||
+84
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
|
||||
# Progress Status Record 2 of 13
|
||||
|
||||
| Document field | Value |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Document | Progress Status Record |
|
||||
| Project | BRN WMS |
|
||||
| Project code | 200-WMS-26-001-00 |
|
||||
| Reporting period | 12/01/26–18/02/26 |
|
||||
| Report date | 18/02/26 |
|
||||
| Actual preparation date | 17/08/26 |
|
||||
| Release | 18/02/26 V1.0 Final |
|
||||
| Prepared by | คุณอภิรัชต์ สุภัทรประทีป — Project Manager |
|
||||
| Technical evidence | ธนกร สถิตวิทยากุล — Developer / System Analyst |
|
||||
| Status | Final — ready for review and authorization |
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Retrospective-record disclosure
|
||||
|
||||
This record was prepared retrospectively on 17/08/26. It covers the historical reporting period shown above and does not claim to have been authored or committed on the historical report date. Statements are limited to the evidence classification and references identified below.
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Period objective
|
||||
|
||||
**Milestone:** Requirements and planning baseline
|
||||
|
||||
**Planned outcome:** Collect customer requirements and define schedule, resources, risks, controls, and work-product responsibilities.
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Task progress
|
||||
|
||||
**Period summary:** Customer Requirements, Work Schedule, and Software Project Plan were reconstructed from agreed scope and implementation evidence.
|
||||
|
||||
| Task ID | Task | Planned finish | Actual / evidence date | Completion | Evidence | Status |
|
||||
|---|---|---:|---:|---:|---|---|
|
||||
| 2.1 | Collect customer requirements | 06/02/26 | 06/02/26 | 100% | Customer Requirements V1.0 Final | Reconstructed completed |
|
||||
| 2.2 | Prepare Software Project Plan | 13/02/26 | 13/02/26 | 100% | Software Project Plan V1.0 Final | Reconstructed completed |
|
||||
| 2.3 | Baseline requirements and schedule | 18/02/26 | 18/02/26 | 100% | Work Schedule and Project Plan | Reconstructed completed; approval pending |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
| Evidence field | Value |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Evidence classification | Document reconstructed |
|
||||
| Evidence reference | Project Plan work products |
|
||||
| Overall period status | Not rated — reconstructed |
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Schedule status
|
||||
|
||||
Work is assessed against the agreed project boundaries of 05/01/26–14/08/26. No unsupported numeric variance is asserted for this period. Where the evidence is reconstructed, schedule status remains explicitly unrated rather than represented as contemporaneously measured.
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. Issues, risks, and corrective action
|
||||
|
||||
**Issue or risk:** Exact elicitation dates and contemporaneous approvals are unavailable.
|
||||
|
||||
**Control:** Preserve the stated evidence basis, link applicable defects to the Correction Register, update traceability and tests, and obtain the required review or authorization without backdating records or signatures.
|
||||
|
||||
## 6. Changes
|
||||
|
||||
Technical commits in this period are implementation evidence. They must be classified separately as in-scope implementation, defect correction, or an authorized baseline change before being entered in the Change Report.
|
||||
|
||||
## 7. Next-period plan
|
||||
|
||||
Begin controlled software implementation on 19/02/26.
|
||||
|
||||
## 8. Approval
|
||||
|
||||
### Prepared by
|
||||
|
||||
Name: คุณอภิรัชต์ สุภัทรประทีป
|
||||
Role: Project Manager
|
||||
Signature: ______________________________________________
|
||||
Date: ___________________________________________________
|
||||
|
||||
### Technical evidence provided by
|
||||
|
||||
Name: ธนกร สถิตวิทยากุล
|
||||
Role: Developer / System Analyst
|
||||
Signature: ______________________________________________
|
||||
Date: ___________________________________________________
|
||||
|
||||
### Reviewed and authorized by
|
||||
|
||||
Name: คุณเสรี วิริยะสกุลธรณ์
|
||||
Project roles: Project Sponsor / Customer Representative / Authorized Approver
|
||||
Position: กรรมการผู้จัดการ
|
||||
Company: บริษัท บี.อาร์.เอ็น. เอ็นเตอร์ไพรส์ จำกัด
|
||||
Signature: ______________________________________________
|
||||
Date: ___________________________________________________
|
||||
+82
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
|
||||
# Progress Status Record 3 of 13
|
||||
|
||||
| Document field | Value |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Document | Progress Status Record |
|
||||
| Project | BRN WMS |
|
||||
| Project code | 200-WMS-26-001-00 |
|
||||
| Reporting period | 19/02/26–25/02/26 |
|
||||
| Report date | 25/02/26 |
|
||||
| Actual preparation date | 17/08/26 |
|
||||
| Release | 25/02/26 V1.0 Final |
|
||||
| Prepared by | คุณอภิรัชต์ สุภัทรประทีป — Project Manager |
|
||||
| Technical evidence | ธนกร สถิตวิทยากุล — Developer / System Analyst |
|
||||
| Status | Final — ready for review and authorization |
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Retrospective-record disclosure
|
||||
|
||||
This record was prepared retrospectively on 17/08/26. It covers the historical reporting period shown above and does not claim to have been authored or committed on the historical report date. Statements are limited to the evidence classification and references identified below.
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Period objective
|
||||
|
||||
**Milestone:** Application initialization
|
||||
|
||||
**Planned outcome:** Initialize the repository and establish initial application and file-upload capability.
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Task progress
|
||||
|
||||
**Period summary:** WMS repository initialized; verification commit and dropzone/file-upload work completed.
|
||||
|
||||
| Task ID | Task | Planned finish | Actual / evidence date | Completion | Evidence | Status |
|
||||
|---|---|---:|---:|---:|---|---|
|
||||
| 3.1 | Initialize WMS application | 25/02/26 | 25/02/26 | 100% | Git `9a50080`–`1843308` | Completed |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
| Evidence field | Value |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Evidence classification | Git evidenced |
|
||||
| Evidence reference | `9a50080`, `42a3876`, `8625652`, `1843308` |
|
||||
| Overall period status | Green |
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Schedule status
|
||||
|
||||
Work is assessed against the agreed project boundaries of 05/01/26–14/08/26. No unsupported numeric variance is asserted for this period. Where the evidence is reconstructed, schedule status remains explicitly unrated rather than represented as contemporaneously measured.
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. Issues, risks, and corrective action
|
||||
|
||||
**Issue or risk:** No unresolved blocker is evidenced in the repository for this period.
|
||||
|
||||
**Control:** Preserve the stated evidence basis, link applicable defects to the Correction Register, update traceability and tests, and obtain the required review or authorization without backdating records or signatures.
|
||||
|
||||
## 6. Changes
|
||||
|
||||
Technical commits in this period are implementation evidence. They must be classified separately as in-scope implementation, defect correction, or an authorized baseline change before being entered in the Change Report.
|
||||
|
||||
## 7. Next-period plan
|
||||
|
||||
Protect configuration, address security findings, and establish the stock database foundation.
|
||||
|
||||
## 8. Approval
|
||||
|
||||
### Prepared by
|
||||
|
||||
Name: คุณอภิรัชต์ สุภัทรประทีป
|
||||
Role: Project Manager
|
||||
Signature: ______________________________________________
|
||||
Date: ___________________________________________________
|
||||
|
||||
### Technical evidence provided by
|
||||
|
||||
Name: ธนกร สถิตวิทยากุล
|
||||
Role: Developer / System Analyst
|
||||
Signature: ______________________________________________
|
||||
Date: ___________________________________________________
|
||||
|
||||
### Reviewed and authorized by
|
||||
|
||||
Name: คุณเสรี วิริยะสกุลธรณ์
|
||||
Project roles: Project Sponsor / Customer Representative / Authorized Approver
|
||||
Position: กรรมการผู้จัดการ
|
||||
Company: บริษัท บี.อาร์.เอ็น. เอ็นเตอร์ไพรส์ จำกัด
|
||||
Signature: ______________________________________________
|
||||
Date: ___________________________________________________
|
||||
+82
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
|
||||
# Progress Status Record 4 of 13
|
||||
|
||||
| Document field | Value |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Document | Progress Status Record |
|
||||
| Project | BRN WMS |
|
||||
| Project code | 200-WMS-26-001-00 |
|
||||
| Reporting period | 09/03/26–17/03/26 |
|
||||
| Report date | 17/03/26 |
|
||||
| Actual preparation date | 17/08/26 |
|
||||
| Release | 17/03/26 V1.0 Final |
|
||||
| Prepared by | คุณอภิรัชต์ สุภัทรประทีป — Project Manager |
|
||||
| Technical evidence | ธนกร สถิตวิทยากุล — Developer / System Analyst |
|
||||
| Status | Final — ready for review and authorization |
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Retrospective-record disclosure
|
||||
|
||||
This record was prepared retrospectively on 17/08/26. It covers the historical reporting period shown above and does not claim to have been authored or committed on the historical report date. Statements are limited to the evidence classification and references identified below.
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Period objective
|
||||
|
||||
**Milestone:** Security, database, and ICS foundation
|
||||
|
||||
**Planned outcome:** Protect local configuration, address initial security findings, design the stock database, and introduce inventory-control modules.
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Task progress
|
||||
|
||||
**Period summary:** Configuration was removed from tracking, security-audit fixes were applied, stock database design was committed, and ICS modules were introduced.
|
||||
|
||||
| Task ID | Task | Planned finish | Actual / evidence date | Completion | Evidence | Status |
|
||||
|---|---|---:|---:|---:|---|---|
|
||||
| 3.2 | Security and database foundation | 17/03/26 | 17/03/26 | 100% | Git `93d903c`–`a4f474b` | Completed |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
| Evidence field | Value |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Evidence classification | Git evidenced |
|
||||
| Evidence reference | `93d903c`, `7cb78d0`, `2e558a5`, `a4f474b` |
|
||||
| Overall period status | Green |
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Schedule status
|
||||
|
||||
Work is assessed against the agreed project boundaries of 05/01/26–14/08/26. No unsupported numeric variance is asserted for this period. Where the evidence is reconstructed, schedule status remains explicitly unrated rather than represented as contemporaneously measured.
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. Issues, risks, and corrective action
|
||||
|
||||
**Issue or risk:** The period contains a gap in commit activity before the documented security/database work.
|
||||
|
||||
**Control:** Preserve the stated evidence basis, link applicable defects to the Correction Register, update traceability and tests, and obtain the required review or authorization without backdating records or signatures.
|
||||
|
||||
## 6. Changes
|
||||
|
||||
Technical commits in this period are implementation evidence. They must be classified separately as in-scope implementation, defect correction, or an authorized baseline change before being entered in the Change Report.
|
||||
|
||||
## 7. Next-period plan
|
||||
|
||||
Develop stock visibility, warehouse structure, product controls, and operational reports.
|
||||
|
||||
## 8. Approval
|
||||
|
||||
### Prepared by
|
||||
|
||||
Name: คุณอภิรัชต์ สุภัทรประทีป
|
||||
Role: Project Manager
|
||||
Signature: ______________________________________________
|
||||
Date: ___________________________________________________
|
||||
|
||||
### Technical evidence provided by
|
||||
|
||||
Name: ธนกร สถิตวิทยากุล
|
||||
Role: Developer / System Analyst
|
||||
Signature: ______________________________________________
|
||||
Date: ___________________________________________________
|
||||
|
||||
### Reviewed and authorized by
|
||||
|
||||
Name: คุณเสรี วิริยะสกุลธรณ์
|
||||
Project roles: Project Sponsor / Customer Representative / Authorized Approver
|
||||
Position: กรรมการผู้จัดการ
|
||||
Company: บริษัท บี.อาร์.เอ็น. เอ็นเตอร์ไพรส์ จำกัด
|
||||
Signature: ______________________________________________
|
||||
Date: ___________________________________________________
|
||||
+82
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
|
||||
# Progress Status Record 5 of 13
|
||||
|
||||
| Document field | Value |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Document | Progress Status Record |
|
||||
| Project | BRN WMS |
|
||||
| Project code | 200-WMS-26-001-00 |
|
||||
| Reporting period | 09/04/26–29/04/26 |
|
||||
| Report date | 29/04/26 |
|
||||
| Actual preparation date | 17/08/26 |
|
||||
| Release | 29/04/26 V1.0 Final |
|
||||
| Prepared by | คุณอภิรัชต์ สุภัทรประทีป — Project Manager |
|
||||
| Technical evidence | ธนกร สถิตวิทยากุล — Developer / System Analyst |
|
||||
| Status | Final — ready for review and authorization |
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Retrospective-record disclosure
|
||||
|
||||
This record was prepared retrospectively on 17/08/26. It covers the historical reporting period shown above and does not claim to have been authored or committed on the historical report date. Statements are limited to the evidence classification and references identified below.
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Period objective
|
||||
|
||||
**Milestone:** Inventory, warehouse, and access foundation
|
||||
|
||||
**Planned outcome:** Implement stock dashboard, products, warehouse capacity, traceability, reports, settings, authentication, and reusable managers.
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Task progress
|
||||
|
||||
**Period summary:** Dashboard, product files, OOP utilities, capacity/occupancy, lot/serial/expiry, reports, settings, login/onboarding, and manager classes were implemented.
|
||||
|
||||
| Task ID | Task | Planned finish | Actual / evidence date | Completion | Evidence | Status |
|
||||
|---|---|---:|---:|---:|---|---|
|
||||
| 3.3 | Inventory and warehouse modules | 29/04/26 | 29/04/26 | 100% | Git `3b8f94f`–`db5c47b` | Completed |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
| Evidence field | Value |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Evidence classification | Git evidenced |
|
||||
| Evidence reference | `3b8f94f` through `db5c47b` |
|
||||
| Overall period status | Green |
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Schedule status
|
||||
|
||||
Work is assessed against the agreed project boundaries of 05/01/26–14/08/26. No unsupported numeric variance is asserted for this period. Where the evidence is reconstructed, schedule status remains explicitly unrated rather than represented as contemporaneously measured.
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. Issues, risks, and corrective action
|
||||
|
||||
**Issue or risk:** Rapid module growth increased the need for consistent authorization and lifecycle review.
|
||||
|
||||
**Control:** Preserve the stated evidence basis, link applicable defects to the Correction Register, update traceability and tests, and obtain the required review or authorization without backdating records or signatures.
|
||||
|
||||
## 6. Changes
|
||||
|
||||
Technical commits in this period are implementation evidence. They must be classified separately as in-scope implementation, defect correction, or an authorized baseline change before being entered in the Change Report.
|
||||
|
||||
## 7. Next-period plan
|
||||
|
||||
Complete document approval logic, orders, warehouse layers, barcode, and role guards.
|
||||
|
||||
## 8. Approval
|
||||
|
||||
### Prepared by
|
||||
|
||||
Name: คุณอภิรัชต์ สุภัทรประทีป
|
||||
Role: Project Manager
|
||||
Signature: ______________________________________________
|
||||
Date: ___________________________________________________
|
||||
|
||||
### Technical evidence provided by
|
||||
|
||||
Name: ธนกร สถิตวิทยากุล
|
||||
Role: Developer / System Analyst
|
||||
Signature: ______________________________________________
|
||||
Date: ___________________________________________________
|
||||
|
||||
### Reviewed and authorized by
|
||||
|
||||
Name: คุณเสรี วิริยะสกุลธรณ์
|
||||
Project roles: Project Sponsor / Customer Representative / Authorized Approver
|
||||
Position: กรรมการผู้จัดการ
|
||||
Company: บริษัท บี.อาร์.เอ็น. เอ็นเตอร์ไพรส์ จำกัด
|
||||
Signature: ______________________________________________
|
||||
Date: ___________________________________________________
|
||||
+83
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
|
||||
# Progress Status Record 6 of 13
|
||||
|
||||
| Document field | Value |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Document | Progress Status Record |
|
||||
| Project | BRN WMS |
|
||||
| Project code | 200-WMS-26-001-00 |
|
||||
| Reporting period | 30/04/26–08/05/26 |
|
||||
| Report date | 08/05/26 |
|
||||
| Actual preparation date | 17/08/26 |
|
||||
| Release | 08/05/26 V1.0 Final |
|
||||
| Prepared by | คุณอภิรัชต์ สุภัทรประทีป — Project Manager |
|
||||
| Technical evidence | ธนกร สถิตวิทยากุล — Developer / System Analyst |
|
||||
| Status | Final — ready for review and authorization |
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Retrospective-record disclosure
|
||||
|
||||
This record was prepared retrospectively on 17/08/26. It covers the historical reporting period shown above and does not claim to have been authored or committed on the historical report date. Statements are limited to the evidence classification and references identified below.
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Period objective
|
||||
|
||||
**Milestone:** Orders, barcode, and security controls
|
||||
|
||||
**Planned outcome:** Implement approval logic, customer order flows, flexible warehouse layers, barcode operations, and centralized role guards.
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Task progress
|
||||
|
||||
**Period summary:** Password scoring, stock approval, orders/returns/invoices, switchable warehouse layers, barcode functions, role guards, security fixes, and naming/session corrections were completed.
|
||||
|
||||
| Task ID | Task | Planned finish | Actual / evidence date | Completion | Evidence | Status |
|
||||
|---|---|---:|---:|---:|---|---|
|
||||
| 3.4 | Authentication and onboarding | 12/05/26 | In progress at 08-May | 70% | Commits through 08/05/26 | In progress; carried forward |
|
||||
| 3.5 | Order and barcode workflows | 08/05/26 | 08/05/26 | 100% | 02/05/26–08/05/26 commits | Completed |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
| Evidence field | Value |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Evidence classification | Git evidenced |
|
||||
| Evidence reference | 30/04/26–08/05/26 commits |
|
||||
| Overall period status | Green |
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Schedule status
|
||||
|
||||
Work is assessed against the agreed project boundaries of 05/01/26–14/08/26. No unsupported numeric variance is asserted for this period. Where the evidence is reconstructed, schedule status remains explicitly unrated rather than represented as contemporaneously measured.
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. Issues, risks, and corrective action
|
||||
|
||||
**Issue or risk:** Security gaps were actively corrected during implementation; formal correction records remain to be linked.
|
||||
|
||||
**Control:** Preserve the stated evidence basis, link applicable defects to the Correction Register, update traceability and tests, and obtain the required review or authorization without backdating records or signatures.
|
||||
|
||||
## 6. Changes
|
||||
|
||||
Technical commits in this period are implementation evidence. They must be classified separately as in-scope implementation, defect correction, or an authorized baseline change before being entered in the Change Report.
|
||||
|
||||
## 7. Next-period plan
|
||||
|
||||
Prepare production setup and introduce accounting capabilities.
|
||||
|
||||
## 8. Approval
|
||||
|
||||
### Prepared by
|
||||
|
||||
Name: คุณอภิรัชต์ สุภัทรประทีป
|
||||
Role: Project Manager
|
||||
Signature: ______________________________________________
|
||||
Date: ___________________________________________________
|
||||
|
||||
### Technical evidence provided by
|
||||
|
||||
Name: ธนกร สถิตวิทยากุล
|
||||
Role: Developer / System Analyst
|
||||
Signature: ______________________________________________
|
||||
Date: ___________________________________________________
|
||||
|
||||
### Reviewed and authorized by
|
||||
|
||||
Name: คุณเสรี วิริยะสกุลธรณ์
|
||||
Project roles: Project Sponsor / Customer Representative / Authorized Approver
|
||||
Position: กรรมการผู้จัดการ
|
||||
Company: บริษัท บี.อาร์.เอ็น. เอ็นเตอร์ไพรส์ จำกัด
|
||||
Signature: ______________________________________________
|
||||
Date: ___________________________________________________
|
||||
+84
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
|
||||
# Progress Status Record 7 of 13
|
||||
|
||||
| Document field | Value |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Document | Progress Status Record |
|
||||
| Project | BRN WMS |
|
||||
| Project code | 200-WMS-26-001-00 |
|
||||
| Reporting period | 11/05/26–13/05/26 |
|
||||
| Report date | 13/05/26 |
|
||||
| Actual preparation date | 17/08/26 |
|
||||
| Release | 13/05/26 V1.0 Final |
|
||||
| Prepared by | คุณอภิรัชต์ สุภัทรประทีป — Project Manager |
|
||||
| Technical evidence | ธนกร สถิตวิทยากุล — Developer / System Analyst |
|
||||
| Status | Final — ready for review and authorization |
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Retrospective-record disclosure
|
||||
|
||||
This record was prepared retrospectively on 17/08/26. It covers the historical reporting period shown above and does not claim to have been authored or committed on the historical report date. Statements are limited to the evidence classification and references identified below.
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Period objective
|
||||
|
||||
**Milestone:** Production preparation and accounting foundation
|
||||
|
||||
**Planned outcome:** Prepare deployment, automate setup, correct onboarding/recovery, populate test data, and introduce accounting.
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Task progress
|
||||
|
||||
**Period summary:** Production preparation, dynamic base URL, automated setup, password recovery, onboarding fixes, test data, dashboard updates, and accounting modules were committed.
|
||||
|
||||
| Task ID | Task | Planned finish | Actual / evidence date | Completion | Evidence | Status |
|
||||
|---|---|---:|---:|---:|---|---|
|
||||
| 3.4 | Authentication and onboarding | 12/05/26 | 12/05/26 | 100% | Login/onboarding and recovery commits | Completed |
|
||||
| 3.6 | Production preparation and setup | 13/05/26 | 13/05/26 | 100% | 11/05/26–13/05/26 commits | Completed |
|
||||
| 3.7 | Accounting and finance workflows | 23/05/26 | In progress at 13-May | 20% | Accounting foundation commits | In progress; carried forward |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
| Evidence field | Value |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Evidence classification | Git evidenced |
|
||||
| Evidence reference | 11/05/26–13/05/26 commits |
|
||||
| Overall period status | Green |
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Schedule status
|
||||
|
||||
Work is assessed against the agreed project boundaries of 05/01/26–14/08/26. No unsupported numeric variance is asserted for this period. Where the evidence is reconstructed, schedule status remains explicitly unrated rather than represented as contemporaneously measured.
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. Issues, risks, and corrective action
|
||||
|
||||
**Issue or risk:** Multiple fixes and a revert occurred during integration; results require traceability to tests.
|
||||
|
||||
**Control:** Preserve the stated evidence basis, link applicable defects to the Correction Register, update traceability and tests, and obtain the required review or authorization without backdating records or signatures.
|
||||
|
||||
## 6. Changes
|
||||
|
||||
Technical commits in this period are implementation evidence. They must be classified separately as in-scope implementation, defect correction, or an authorized baseline change before being entered in the Change Report.
|
||||
|
||||
## 7. Next-period plan
|
||||
|
||||
Integrate accounting workflows, document control, access limits, and supporting services.
|
||||
|
||||
## 8. Approval
|
||||
|
||||
### Prepared by
|
||||
|
||||
Name: คุณอภิรัชต์ สุภัทรประทีป
|
||||
Role: Project Manager
|
||||
Signature: ______________________________________________
|
||||
Date: ___________________________________________________
|
||||
|
||||
### Technical evidence provided by
|
||||
|
||||
Name: ธนกร สถิตวิทยากุล
|
||||
Role: Developer / System Analyst
|
||||
Signature: ______________________________________________
|
||||
Date: ___________________________________________________
|
||||
|
||||
### Reviewed and authorized by
|
||||
|
||||
Name: คุณเสรี วิริยะสกุลธรณ์
|
||||
Project roles: Project Sponsor / Customer Representative / Authorized Approver
|
||||
Position: กรรมการผู้จัดการ
|
||||
Company: บริษัท บี.อาร์.เอ็น. เอ็นเตอร์ไพรส์ จำกัด
|
||||
Signature: ______________________________________________
|
||||
Date: ___________________________________________________
|
||||
+84
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
|
||||
# Progress Status Record 8 of 13
|
||||
|
||||
| Document field | Value |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Document | Progress Status Record |
|
||||
| Project | BRN WMS |
|
||||
| Project code | 200-WMS-26-001-00 |
|
||||
| Reporting period | 20/05/26–23/05/26 |
|
||||
| Report date | 23/05/26 |
|
||||
| Actual preparation date | 17/08/26 |
|
||||
| Release | 23/05/26 V1.0 Final |
|
||||
| Prepared by | คุณอภิรัชต์ สุภัทรประทีป — Project Manager |
|
||||
| Technical evidence | ธนกร สถิตวิทยากุล — Developer / System Analyst |
|
||||
| Status | Final — ready for review and authorization |
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Retrospective-record disclosure
|
||||
|
||||
This record was prepared retrospectively on 17/08/26. It covers the historical reporting period shown above and does not claim to have been authored or committed on the historical report date. Statements are limited to the evidence classification and references identified below.
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Period objective
|
||||
|
||||
**Milestone:** Accounting integration and supporting services
|
||||
|
||||
**Planned outcome:** Integrate accounting, user invitation/access controls, transaction limits, document flows, Node.js, aggregates, and reports.
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Task progress
|
||||
|
||||
**Period summary:** Accounting workflows, access controls, setup script, soft delete, Socket service, GL aggregation, accounting reports, journal batching, and GL automation were implemented.
|
||||
|
||||
| Task ID | Task | Planned finish | Actual / evidence date | Completion | Evidence | Status |
|
||||
|---|---|---:|---:|---:|---|---|
|
||||
| 3.7 | Accounting and finance workflows | 23/05/26 | 23/05/26 | 100% | 13/05/26–23/05/26 accounting commits | Completed |
|
||||
| 3.8 | Real-time services and scheduled jobs | 27/05/26 | In progress at 23-May | 45% | Node.js and GL aggregate commits | In progress; carried forward |
|
||||
| 3.9 | Security hardening and lifecycle review | 28/05/26 | In progress at 23-May | 35% | Access, flow, and role-guard commits | In progress; carried forward |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
| Evidence field | Value |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Evidence classification | Git evidenced |
|
||||
| Evidence reference | 20/05/26–23/05/26 commits |
|
||||
| Overall period status | Green |
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Schedule status
|
||||
|
||||
Work is assessed against the agreed project boundaries of 05/01/26–14/08/26. No unsupported numeric variance is asserted for this period. Where the evidence is reconstructed, schedule status remains explicitly unrated rather than represented as contemporaneously measured.
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. Issues, risks, and corrective action
|
||||
|
||||
**Issue or risk:** Integration breadth increased regression and tenant-isolation risk.
|
||||
|
||||
**Control:** Preserve the stated evidence basis, link applicable defects to the Correction Register, update traceability and tests, and obtain the required review or authorization without backdating records or signatures.
|
||||
|
||||
## 6. Changes
|
||||
|
||||
Technical commits in this period are implementation evidence. They must be classified separately as in-scope implementation, defect correction, or an authorized baseline change before being entered in the Change Report.
|
||||
|
||||
## 7. Next-period plan
|
||||
|
||||
Complete security hardening, notification control, sequencing, scheduler, tenant scoping, and final review.
|
||||
|
||||
## 8. Approval
|
||||
|
||||
### Prepared by
|
||||
|
||||
Name: คุณอภิรัชต์ สุภัทรประทีป
|
||||
Role: Project Manager
|
||||
Signature: ______________________________________________
|
||||
Date: ___________________________________________________
|
||||
|
||||
### Technical evidence provided by
|
||||
|
||||
Name: ธนกร สถิตวิทยากุล
|
||||
Role: Developer / System Analyst
|
||||
Signature: ______________________________________________
|
||||
Date: ___________________________________________________
|
||||
|
||||
### Reviewed and authorized by
|
||||
|
||||
Name: คุณเสรี วิริยะสกุลธรณ์
|
||||
Project roles: Project Sponsor / Customer Representative / Authorized Approver
|
||||
Position: กรรมการผู้จัดการ
|
||||
Company: บริษัท บี.อาร์.เอ็น. เอ็นเตอร์ไพรส์ จำกัด
|
||||
Signature: ______________________________________________
|
||||
Date: ___________________________________________________
|
||||
+84
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
|
||||
# Progress Status Record 9 of 13
|
||||
|
||||
| Document field | Value |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Document | Progress Status Record |
|
||||
| Project | BRN WMS |
|
||||
| Project code | 200-WMS-26-001-00 |
|
||||
| Reporting period | 24/05/26–29/05/26 |
|
||||
| Report date | 29/05/26 |
|
||||
| Actual preparation date | 17/08/26 |
|
||||
| Release | 29/05/26 V1.0 Final |
|
||||
| Prepared by | คุณอภิรัชต์ สุภัทรประทีป — Project Manager |
|
||||
| Technical evidence | ธนกร สถิตวิทยากุล — Developer / System Analyst |
|
||||
| Status | Final — ready for review and authorization |
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Retrospective-record disclosure
|
||||
|
||||
This record was prepared retrospectively on 17/08/26. It covers the historical reporting period shown above and does not claim to have been authored or committed on the historical report date. Statements are limited to the evidence classification and references identified below.
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Period objective
|
||||
|
||||
**Milestone:** Development baseline
|
||||
|
||||
**Planned outcome:** Harden security and integrity, close known implementation gaps, stabilize services, and establish the substantially complete development baseline.
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Task progress
|
||||
|
||||
**Period summary:** Session controls, aggregates, notifications, security/lifecycle reviews, transaction limits, document sequencing, role guards, scheduler fixes, bin naming, tenant scoping, and final refactoring were completed.
|
||||
|
||||
| Task ID | Task | Planned finish | Actual / evidence date | Completion | Evidence | Status |
|
||||
|---|---|---:|---:|---:|---|---|
|
||||
| 3.8 | Real-time services and scheduled jobs | 27/05/26 | 27/05/26 | 100% | 22–27 May Node.js/scheduler commits | Completed |
|
||||
| 3.9 | Security hardening and lifecycle review | 28/05/26 | 28/05/26 | 100% | 21–28 May hardening/review commits | Completed |
|
||||
| 3.10 | Refactor and development baseline | 29/05/26 | 29/05/26 | 100% | Git `a0677d6` | Completed |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
| Evidence field | Value |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Evidence classification | Git evidenced |
|
||||
| Evidence reference | 24/05/26–29/05/26 commits; final `a0677d6` |
|
||||
| Overall period status | Green |
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Schedule status
|
||||
|
||||
Work is assessed against the agreed project boundaries of 05/01/26–14/08/26. No unsupported numeric variance is asserted for this period. Where the evidence is reconstructed, schedule status remains explicitly unrated rather than represented as contemporaneously measured.
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. Issues, risks, and corrective action
|
||||
|
||||
**Issue or risk:** Formal verification, validation, and acceptance evidence remained to be consolidated after development.
|
||||
|
||||
**Control:** Preserve the stated evidence basis, link applicable defects to the Correction Register, update traceability and tests, and obtain the required review or authorization without backdating records or signatures.
|
||||
|
||||
## 6. Changes
|
||||
|
||||
Technical commits in this period are implementation evidence. They must be classified separately as in-scope implementation, defect correction, or an authorized baseline change before being entered in the Change Report.
|
||||
|
||||
## 7. Next-period plan
|
||||
|
||||
Conduct verification, validation, documentation, and delivery preparation.
|
||||
|
||||
## 8. Approval
|
||||
|
||||
### Prepared by
|
||||
|
||||
Name: คุณอภิรัชต์ สุภัทรประทีป
|
||||
Role: Project Manager
|
||||
Signature: ______________________________________________
|
||||
Date: ___________________________________________________
|
||||
|
||||
### Technical evidence provided by
|
||||
|
||||
Name: ธนกร สถิตวิทยากุล
|
||||
Role: Developer / System Analyst
|
||||
Signature: ______________________________________________
|
||||
Date: ___________________________________________________
|
||||
|
||||
### Reviewed and authorized by
|
||||
|
||||
Name: คุณเสรี วิริยะสกุลธรณ์
|
||||
Project roles: Project Sponsor / Customer Representative / Authorized Approver
|
||||
Position: กรรมการผู้จัดการ
|
||||
Company: บริษัท บี.อาร์.เอ็น. เอ็นเตอร์ไพรส์ จำกัด
|
||||
Signature: ______________________________________________
|
||||
Date: ___________________________________________________
|
||||
+84
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
|
||||
# Progress Status Record 10 of 13
|
||||
|
||||
| Document field | Value |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Document | Progress Status Record |
|
||||
| Project | BRN WMS |
|
||||
| Project code | 200-WMS-26-001-00 |
|
||||
| Reporting period | 30/05/26–31/07/26 |
|
||||
| Report date | 31/07/26 |
|
||||
| Actual preparation date | 17/08/26 |
|
||||
| Release | 31/07/26 V1.0 Final |
|
||||
| Prepared by | คุณอภิรัชต์ สุภัทรประทีป — Project Manager |
|
||||
| Technical evidence | ธนกร สถิตวิทยากุล — Developer / System Analyst |
|
||||
| Status | Final — ready for review and authorization |
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Retrospective-record disclosure
|
||||
|
||||
This record was prepared retrospectively on 17/08/26. It covers the historical reporting period shown above and does not claim to have been authored or committed on the historical report date. Statements are limited to the evidence classification and references identified below.
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Period objective
|
||||
|
||||
**Milestone:** Verification, validation, and documentation
|
||||
|
||||
**Planned outcome:** Verify requirements/design/software, validate intended use, prepare operational documents, and consolidate delivery evidence.
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Task progress
|
||||
|
||||
**Period summary:** This activity period is part of the agreed timeline, but contemporaneous Git evidence is unavailable; assurance and documentation records are being reconstructed from the delivered system.
|
||||
|
||||
| Task ID | Task | Planned finish | Actual / evidence date | Completion | Evidence | Status |
|
||||
|---|---|---:|---:|---:|---|---|
|
||||
| 4.3 | Verify requirements, design, and implementation | 31/07/26 | Evidence consolidation pending | 80% | Reconstructed verification work products | In progress; evidence gap |
|
||||
| 4.4 | Customer-oriented system validation | 07/08/26 | In progress at 31-Jul | 85% | Reconstructed validation activities | In progress; carried forward |
|
||||
| 4.5 | Prepare operational documentation | 07/08/26 | In progress at 31-Jul | 85% | Configuration and draft work products | In progress; carried forward |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
| Evidence field | Value |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Evidence classification | Document reconstructed |
|
||||
| Evidence reference | SRS, Design, Traceability, Test, Guide, Verification, and Validation work products |
|
||||
| Overall period status | Amber |
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Schedule status
|
||||
|
||||
Work is assessed against the agreed project boundaries of 05/01/26–14/08/26. No unsupported numeric variance is asserted for this period. Where the evidence is reconstructed, schedule status remains explicitly unrated rather than represented as contemporaneously measured.
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. Issues, risks, and corrective action
|
||||
|
||||
**Issue or risk:** Missing contemporaneous evidence creates an audit and acceptance gap.
|
||||
|
||||
**Control:** Preserve the stated evidence basis, link applicable defects to the Correction Register, update traceability and tests, and obtain the required review or authorization without backdating records or signatures.
|
||||
|
||||
## 6. Changes
|
||||
|
||||
Technical commits in this period are implementation evidence. They must be classified separately as in-scope implementation, defect correction, or an authorized baseline change before being entered in the Change Report.
|
||||
|
||||
## 7. Next-period plan
|
||||
|
||||
Complete stabilization corrections, finalize evidence, and obtain stakeholder review.
|
||||
|
||||
## 8. Approval
|
||||
|
||||
### Prepared by
|
||||
|
||||
Name: คุณอภิรัชต์ สุภัทรประทีป
|
||||
Role: Project Manager
|
||||
Signature: ______________________________________________
|
||||
Date: ___________________________________________________
|
||||
|
||||
### Technical evidence provided by
|
||||
|
||||
Name: ธนกร สถิตวิทยากุล
|
||||
Role: Developer / System Analyst
|
||||
Signature: ______________________________________________
|
||||
Date: ___________________________________________________
|
||||
|
||||
### Reviewed and authorized by
|
||||
|
||||
Name: คุณเสรี วิริยะสกุลธรณ์
|
||||
Project roles: Project Sponsor / Customer Representative / Authorized Approver
|
||||
Position: กรรมการผู้จัดการ
|
||||
Company: บริษัท บี.อาร์.เอ็น. เอ็นเตอร์ไพรส์ จำกัด
|
||||
Signature: ______________________________________________
|
||||
Date: ___________________________________________________
|
||||
+82
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
|
||||
# Progress Status Record 11 of 13
|
||||
|
||||
| Document field | Value |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Document | Progress Status Record |
|
||||
| Project | BRN WMS |
|
||||
| Project code | 200-WMS-26-001-00 |
|
||||
| Reporting period | 03/08/26 |
|
||||
| Report date | 03/08/26 |
|
||||
| Actual preparation date | 17/08/26 |
|
||||
| Release | 03/08/26 V1.0 Final |
|
||||
| Prepared by | คุณอภิรัชต์ สุภัทรประทีป — Project Manager |
|
||||
| Technical evidence | ธนกร สถิตวิทยากุล — Developer / System Analyst |
|
||||
| Status | Final — ready for review and authorization |
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Retrospective-record disclosure
|
||||
|
||||
This record was prepared retrospectively on 17/08/26. It covers the historical reporting period shown above and does not claim to have been authored or committed on the historical report date. Statements are limited to the evidence classification and references identified below.
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Period objective
|
||||
|
||||
**Milestone:** Stabilization correction
|
||||
|
||||
**Planned outcome:** Correct login and environment-configuration issues identified after the development baseline.
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Task progress
|
||||
|
||||
**Period summary:** Login and configuration corrections were committed.
|
||||
|
||||
| Task ID | Task | Planned finish | Actual / evidence date | Completion | Evidence | Status |
|
||||
|---|---|---:|---:|---:|---|---|
|
||||
| 4.6 | Configuration and login corrections | 03/08/26 | 03/08/26 | 100% | Git `b2c4374` | Completed; formal correction closure pending |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
| Evidence field | Value |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Evidence classification | Git evidenced |
|
||||
| Evidence reference | `b2c4374` |
|
||||
| Overall period status | Green |
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Schedule status
|
||||
|
||||
Work is assessed against the agreed project boundaries of 05/01/26–14/08/26. No unsupported numeric variance is asserted for this period. Where the evidence is reconstructed, schedule status remains explicitly unrated rather than represented as contemporaneously measured.
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. Issues, risks, and corrective action
|
||||
|
||||
**Issue or risk:** The correction requires linkage to the Correction Register and verification evidence.
|
||||
|
||||
**Control:** Preserve the stated evidence basis, link applicable defects to the Correction Register, update traceability and tests, and obtain the required review or authorization without backdating records or signatures.
|
||||
|
||||
## 6. Changes
|
||||
|
||||
Technical commits in this period are implementation evidence. They must be classified separately as in-scope implementation, defect correction, or an authorized baseline change before being entered in the Change Report.
|
||||
|
||||
## 7. Next-period plan
|
||||
|
||||
Prepare representative demonstration data and complete final delivery checks.
|
||||
|
||||
## 8. Approval
|
||||
|
||||
### Prepared by
|
||||
|
||||
Name: คุณอภิรัชต์ สุภัทรประทีป
|
||||
Role: Project Manager
|
||||
Signature: ______________________________________________
|
||||
Date: ___________________________________________________
|
||||
|
||||
### Technical evidence provided by
|
||||
|
||||
Name: ธนกร สถิตวิทยากุล
|
||||
Role: Developer / System Analyst
|
||||
Signature: ______________________________________________
|
||||
Date: ___________________________________________________
|
||||
|
||||
### Reviewed and authorized by
|
||||
|
||||
Name: คุณเสรี วิริยะสกุลธรณ์
|
||||
Project roles: Project Sponsor / Customer Representative / Authorized Approver
|
||||
Position: กรรมการผู้จัดการ
|
||||
Company: บริษัท บี.อาร์.เอ็น. เอ็นเตอร์ไพรส์ จำกัด
|
||||
Signature: ______________________________________________
|
||||
Date: ___________________________________________________
|
||||
+86
@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
|
||||
# Progress Status Record 12 of 13
|
||||
|
||||
| Document field | Value |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Document | Progress Status Record |
|
||||
| Project | BRN WMS |
|
||||
| Project code | 200-WMS-26-001-00 |
|
||||
| Reporting period | 04/08/26–14/08/26 |
|
||||
| Report date | 14/08/26 |
|
||||
| Actual preparation date | 17/08/26 |
|
||||
| Release | 14/08/26 V1.0 Final |
|
||||
| Prepared by | คุณอภิรัชต์ สุภัทรประทีป — Project Manager |
|
||||
| Technical evidence | ธนกร สถิตวิทยากุล — Developer / System Analyst |
|
||||
| Status | Final — ready for review and authorization |
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Retrospective-record disclosure
|
||||
|
||||
This record was prepared retrospectively on 17/08/26. It covers the historical reporting period shown above and does not claim to have been authored or committed on the historical report date. Statements are limited to the evidence classification and references identified below.
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Period objective
|
||||
|
||||
**Milestone:** Demonstration and completion boundary
|
||||
|
||||
**Planned outcome:** Prepare controlled demonstration data, complete final checks, and reach the agreed project-completion boundary.
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Task progress
|
||||
|
||||
**Period summary:** Demonstration data was committed on 14/08/26 and the agreed formal completion date was reached.
|
||||
|
||||
| Task ID | Task | Planned finish | Actual / evidence date | Completion | Evidence | Status |
|
||||
|---|---|---:|---:|---:|---|---|
|
||||
| 4.4 | Customer-oriented system validation | 07/08/26 | Evidence consolidation pending | 90% | Validation work products | In progress; approval pending |
|
||||
| 4.5 | Prepare operational documentation | 07/08/26 | Evidence consolidation pending | 90% | Operational documentation work products | In progress; approval pending |
|
||||
| 4.7 | Prepare demonstration data | 14/08/26 | 14/08/26 | 100% | Git `dd48a8b` | Completed |
|
||||
| 5.1 | Final repository and work-product review | 14/08/26 | In progress | 70% | Repository and SDLC gap review | In progress; carried forward |
|
||||
| 5.2 | Acceptance and project closure | 14/08/26 | Pending signature | 75% | Completion boundary reached | Acceptance pending |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
| Evidence field | Value |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Evidence classification | Git evidenced / agreed boundary |
|
||||
| Evidence reference | `dd48a8b`; agreed completion date |
|
||||
| Overall period status | Green |
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Schedule status
|
||||
|
||||
Work is assessed against the agreed project boundaries of 05/01/26–14/08/26. No unsupported numeric variance is asserted for this period. Where the evidence is reconstructed, schedule status remains explicitly unrated rather than represented as contemporaneously measured.
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. Issues, risks, and corrective action
|
||||
|
||||
**Issue or risk:** Formal signatures and some controlled ISO/IEC 29110 evidence remained open at completion.
|
||||
|
||||
**Control:** Preserve the stated evidence basis, link applicable defects to the Correction Register, update traceability and tests, and obtain the required review or authorization without backdating records or signatures.
|
||||
|
||||
## 6. Changes
|
||||
|
||||
Technical commits in this period are implementation evidence. They must be classified separately as in-scope implementation, defect correction, or an authorized baseline change before being entered in the Change Report.
|
||||
|
||||
## 7. Next-period plan
|
||||
|
||||
Consolidate remaining work products and obtain Project Sponsor authorization.
|
||||
|
||||
## 8. Approval
|
||||
|
||||
### Prepared by
|
||||
|
||||
Name: คุณอภิรัชต์ สุภัทรประทีป
|
||||
Role: Project Manager
|
||||
Signature: ______________________________________________
|
||||
Date: ___________________________________________________
|
||||
|
||||
### Technical evidence provided by
|
||||
|
||||
Name: ธนกร สถิตวิทยากุล
|
||||
Role: Developer / System Analyst
|
||||
Signature: ______________________________________________
|
||||
Date: ___________________________________________________
|
||||
|
||||
### Reviewed and authorized by
|
||||
|
||||
Name: คุณเสรี วิริยะสกุลธรณ์
|
||||
Project roles: Project Sponsor / Customer Representative / Authorized Approver
|
||||
Position: กรรมการผู้จัดการ
|
||||
Company: บริษัท บี.อาร์.เอ็น. เอ็นเตอร์ไพรส์ จำกัด
|
||||
Signature: ______________________________________________
|
||||
Date: ___________________________________________________
|
||||
+85
@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
|
||||
# Progress Status Record 13 of 13
|
||||
|
||||
| Document field | Value |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Document | Progress Status Record |
|
||||
| Project | BRN WMS |
|
||||
| Project code | 200-WMS-26-001-00 |
|
||||
| Reporting period | 15/08/26–17/08/26 |
|
||||
| Report date | 17/08/26 |
|
||||
| Actual preparation date | 17/08/26 |
|
||||
| Release | 17/08/26 V1.0 Final |
|
||||
| Prepared by | คุณอภิรัชต์ สุภัทรประทีป — Project Manager |
|
||||
| Technical evidence | ธนกร สถิตวิทยากุล — Developer / System Analyst |
|
||||
| Status | Final — ready for review and authorization |
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Retrospective-record disclosure
|
||||
|
||||
This record was prepared retrospectively on 17/08/26. It covers the historical reporting period shown above and does not claim to have been authored or committed on the historical report date. Statements are limited to the evidence classification and references identified below.
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Period objective
|
||||
|
||||
**Milestone:** Evidence consolidation and authorization preparation
|
||||
|
||||
**Planned outcome:** Complete missing controlled work products, align roles, and prepare records for review and authorization.
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Task progress
|
||||
|
||||
**Period summary:** PM work products were converted to reviewable Markdown, project identities and roles were aligned, and missing evidence was identified for subsequent completion.
|
||||
|
||||
| Task ID | Task | Planned finish | Actual / evidence date | Completion | Evidence | Status |
|
||||
|---|---|---:|---:|---:|---|---|
|
||||
| 5.1 | Final repository and work-product review | 14/08/26 | In progress at 17-Aug | 80% | BRN WMS PM work products and gap list | In progress |
|
||||
| 5.2 | Acceptance and project closure | 14/08/26 | Pending evidence and signature | 75% | Acceptance evidence not yet authorized | Acceptance pending |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
| Evidence field | Value |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Evidence classification | Document reconstructed |
|
||||
| Evidence reference | Current `sdlc/` repository and Git status |
|
||||
| Overall period status | Amber |
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Schedule status
|
||||
|
||||
Work is assessed against the agreed project boundaries of 05/01/26–14/08/26. No unsupported numeric variance is asserted for this period. Where the evidence is reconstructed, schedule status remains explicitly unrated rather than represented as contemporaneously measured.
|
||||
|
||||
**Note on this record's reporting period falling after the project boundary:** this record's reporting period (15/08/26–17/08/26) is later than the agreed project period end date (14/08/26) on purpose, not by error. Tasks 5.1 and 5.2 above were both planned to finish on 14/08/26 and did not; this record documents that overrun in progress, not a new phase beyond the agreed boundary. It is the evidence trail for the same "past planned closure date, closure activities still open" status disclosed in the Acceptance Report (work product 5) and `SDLC_DOCS.md`.
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. Issues, risks, and corrective action
|
||||
|
||||
**Issue or risk:** Verification, validation, repository-backup, and acceptance evidence and signatures remain open.
|
||||
|
||||
**Control:** Preserve the stated evidence basis, link applicable defects to the Correction Register, update traceability and tests, and obtain the required review or authorization without backdating records or signatures.
|
||||
|
||||
## 6. Changes
|
||||
|
||||
Technical commits in this period are implementation evidence. They must be classified separately as in-scope implementation, defect correction, or an authorized baseline change before being entered in the Change Report.
|
||||
|
||||
## 7. Next-period plan
|
||||
|
||||
Complete remaining PM/SI work products and obtain Project Sponsor review and authorization.
|
||||
|
||||
## 8. Approval
|
||||
|
||||
### Prepared by
|
||||
|
||||
Name: คุณอภิรัชต์ สุภัทรประทีป
|
||||
Role: Project Manager
|
||||
Signature: ______________________________________________
|
||||
Date: ___________________________________________________
|
||||
|
||||
### Technical evidence provided by
|
||||
|
||||
Name: ธนกร สถิตวิทยากุล
|
||||
Role: Developer / System Analyst
|
||||
Signature: ______________________________________________
|
||||
Date: ___________________________________________________
|
||||
|
||||
### Reviewed and authorized by
|
||||
|
||||
Name: คุณเสรี วิริยะสกุลธรณ์
|
||||
Project roles: Project Sponsor / Customer Representative / Authorized Approver
|
||||
Position: กรรมการผู้จัดการ
|
||||
Company: บริษัท บี.อาร์.เอ็น. เอ็นเตอร์ไพรส์ จำกัด
|
||||
Signature: ______________________________________________
|
||||
Date: ___________________________________________________
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user