SDLC docs feedback and additional adjustment

This commit is contained in:
Thanakorn
2026-08-19 10:02:21 +07:00
parent 6765054950
commit 849158059b
43 changed files with 877 additions and 437 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
# Meeting Record — Closure Preparation Checkpoint
| Document field | Value |
|---|---|
| Document | Meeting Record |
| Meeting ID | MTG-004 |
| Project | BRN WMS |
| Project code | 200-WMS-26-001-00 |
| Phase | Project closure |
| Meeting date | 14/08/26 |
| Related Progress Status Record | Progress Status Record 12 of 13 (reporting period 04/08/26–14/08/26) |
| Milestone | Demonstration data and closure preparation |
| Organizer | Apirach Supattaratpateep — Project Manager |
| Recorder | Apirach Supattaratpateep — Project Manager |
| Release | 14/08/26 V1.0 |
| Standard | ISO/IEC 29110 Basic Profile |
| Status | Final |
## 1. Purpose
This record documents the project checkpoint meeting held at the demonstration data and closure preparation milestone. It is the meeting counterpart to Progress Status Record 12 of 13; the task status and evidence reported here are the same as those recorded in that Progress Status Record.
**Implementation evidence for this checkpoint:** `dd48a8b` — Demo Data Population
## 2. Participants
| No. | Name | Project role | Attendance |
|---:|---|---|---|
| 1 | Seri Viriyasakultorn | Project Sponsor / Customer Representative / Authorized Approver | Attended |
| 2 | Apirach Supattaratpateep | Project Manager | Attended |
| 3 | Noppong Chareunsook | System Analyst | Attended |
| 4 | Thanakorn Sathitwitayakul | Developer | Attended |
| 5 | Parin Ngamkham | QA / Tester | Attended |
| 6 | Yaowalak Bangchomphoo | Document Control | Attended |
Time and location were not recorded contemporaneously.
## 3. Agenda
| No. | Item |
|---:|---|
| 1 | Confirm population of controlled demonstration data |
| 2 | Review the completed test and validation execution of 10/08/26–14/08/26 |
| 3 | Review remaining closure work against the project end date of 24/08/26 |
| 4 | Agree the approach to remaining work products and signatures |
## 4. Project progress
Task 4.7 (prepare demonstration data) closed at 100% on its planned date of 14/08/26. Tasks 4.4 and 4.5 passed their planned finish of 07/08/26 and were carried forward for evidence consolidation. Tasks 5.1 and 5.2 remained open against the project end date of 24/08/26. The 34 test cases and 12 validation scenarios were executed over 10/08/26–14/08/26.
## 5. Discussion and decisions
The Developer confirmed that controlled demonstration data had been populated to support validation and handover. The QA/Tester reported that the 34 defined test cases had been executed on the internal testing server and the Customer Representative reported that the 12 validation scenarios had been executed on the customer production environment, all over 10/08/26–14/08/26, with no open test defect. The meeting agreed that the remaining closure work — evidence consolidation, final repository and work-product review, independent verification and acceptance signatures — would be completed within the project period ending 24/08/26. No functional scope was added and no schedule change was required.
### Action items
| No. | Action | Owner | Target |
|---:|---|---|---|
| 1 | Consolidate the test and validation results into the controlled work products | QA / Tester | 17/08/26 |
| 2 | Perform independent Round 2 verification of the work-product set | Document Control | 17/08/26 |
| 3 | Complete the final repository and work-product review | Project Manager / Document Control | 24/08/26 |
| 4 | Obtain Project Sponsor signatures on the controlled work products | Project Manager | 24/08/26 |
### Next checkpoint
Closure activities continue to the project end date of 24/08/26.
## 6. Approval
### Prepared by
Name: Apirach Supattaratpateep
Role: Project Manager
Signature: ______________________________________________
Date: ___________________________________________________
### Technical evidence provided by
Name: Thanakorn Sathitwitayakul
Role: Developer
Signature: ______________________________________________
Date: ___________________________________________________
### Reviewed and authorized by
Name: Seri Viriyasakultorn
Project roles: Project Sponsor / Customer Representative / Authorized Approver
Position: Managing Director
Company: B.R.N. Enterprise Co., Ltd.
Signature: ______________________________________________
Date: ___________________________________________________
@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
# Meeting Record — Development Substantially Complete Checkpoint
| Document field | Value |
|---|---|
| Document | Meeting Record |
| Meeting ID | MTG-002 |
| Project | BRN WMS |
| Project code | 200-WMS-26-001-00 |
| Phase | Execution — development baseline |
| Meeting date | 29/05/26 |
| Related Progress Status Record | Progress Status Record 9 of 13 (reporting period 24/05/26–29/05/26) |
| Milestone | Development baseline |
| Organizer | Apirach Supattaratpateep — Project Manager |
| Recorder | Apirach Supattaratpateep — Project Manager |
| Release | 29/05/26 V1.0 |
| Standard | ISO/IEC 29110 Basic Profile |
| Status | Final |
## 1. Purpose
This record documents the project checkpoint meeting held at the development baseline milestone. It is the meeting counterpart to Progress Status Record 9 of 13; the task status and evidence reported here are the same as those recorded in that Progress Status Record.
**Implementation evidence for this checkpoint:** `a0677d6` — Classe methods: remove reducdancy (final main-development commit)
## 2. Participants
| No. | Name | Project role | Attendance |
|---:|---|---|---|
| 1 | Seri Viriyasakultorn | Project Sponsor / Customer Representative / Authorized Approver | Attended |
| 2 | Apirach Supattaratpateep | Project Manager | Attended |
| 3 | Noppong Chareunsook | System Analyst | Attended |
| 4 | Thanakorn Sathitwitayakul | Developer | Attended |
| 5 | Parin Ngamkham | QA / Tester | Attended |
| 6 | Yaowalak Bangchomphoo | Document Control | Attended |
Time and location were not recorded contemporaneously.
## 3. Agenda
| No. | Item |
|---:|---|
| 1 | Confirm completion of the implementation tasks 3.1–3.10 |
| 2 | Review security hardening and lifecycle review outcomes |
| 3 | Review the corrections raised during implementation |
| 4 | Agree the transition to verification, validation and documentation |
## 4. Project progress
Tasks 3.8 (real-time services and scheduled jobs), 3.9 (security hardening and lifecycle review) and 3.10 (refactor and development baseline) all closed at 100% on their planned dates. The substantially complete development baseline was reached as scheduled on 29/05/26.
## 5. Discussion and decisions
The Developer confirmed that all planned implementation tasks were complete and that the security hardening and document-lifecycle reviews had been carried out, with the resulting fixes recorded in the Correction Register. The meeting agreed that the development baseline was reached and that the project would move to verification, validation and operational documentation from 30/05/26. It was noted that formal verification, validation and acceptance evidence still had to be consolidated after development.
### Action items
| No. | Action | Owner | Target |
|---:|---|---|---|
| 1 | Consolidate verification and validation evidence against the requirement baseline | Reviewer / Tester | 31/07/26 |
| 2 | Prepare user, operation and maintenance documentation | Developer / Document Control | 07/08/26 |
| 3 | Link implementation corrections to test evidence in the Correction Register | Developer / QA | Before acceptance |
### Next checkpoint
At the stabilization milestone.
## 6. Approval
### Prepared by
Name: Apirach Supattaratpateep
Role: Project Manager
Signature: ______________________________________________
Date: ___________________________________________________
### Technical evidence provided by
Name: Thanakorn Sathitwitayakul
Role: Developer
Signature: ______________________________________________
Date: ___________________________________________________
### Reviewed and authorized by
Name: Seri Viriyasakultorn
Project roles: Project Sponsor / Customer Representative / Authorized Approver
Position: Managing Director
Company: B.R.N. Enterprise Co., Ltd.
Signature: ______________________________________________
Date: ___________________________________________________
@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
# Meeting Record — Project Initiation Checkpoint
| Document field | Value |
|---|---|
| Document | Meeting Record |
| Meeting ID | MTG-001 |
| Project | BRN WMS |
| Project code | 200-WMS-26-001-00 |
| Phase | Planning — authorization to begin implementation |
| Meeting date | 13/02/26 |
| Related Progress Status Record | Progress Status Record 2 of 13 (reporting period 12/01/26–18/02/26) |
| Milestone | Authorization of development start |
| Organizer | Apirach Supattaratpateep — Project Manager |
| Recorder | Apirach Supattaratpateep — Project Manager |
| Release | 13/02/26 V1.0 |
| Standard | ISO/IEC 29110 Basic Profile |
| Status | Final |
## 1. Purpose
This record documents the project checkpoint meeting held to authorize the start of development. It is the meeting counterpart to Progress Status Record 2 of 13; the task status reported here is the same as that recorded in that Progress Status Record.
This is a planning-phase authorization meeting held ahead of the implementation start date, so it records decisions taken rather than work completed.
## 2. Participants
| No. | Name | Project role | Attendance |
|---:|---|---|---|
| 1 | Seri Viriyasakultorn | Project Sponsor / Customer Representative / Authorized Approver | Attended |
| 2 | Apirach Supattaratpateep | Project Manager | Attended |
| 3 | Noppong Chareunsook | System Analyst | Attended |
| 4 | Thanakorn Sathitwitayakul | Developer | Attended |
| 5 | Parin Ngamkham | QA / Tester | Attended |
| 6 | Yaowalak Bangchomphoo | Document Control | Attended |
Time and location were not recorded contemporaneously.
## 3. Agenda
| No. | Item |
|---:|---|
| 1 | Confirm the requirements and planning baseline ahead of its 18/02/26 finish |
| 2 | Authorize the start of controlled software implementation |
| 3 | Confirm repository, branch, and configuration-control arrangements |
| 4 | Confirm roles and reporting cadence for the execution phase |
## 4. Project progress
Tasks 2.1 (collect customer requirements) and 2.2 (prepare the Software Project Plan) were reported complete. Task 2.3 (baseline requirements and schedule) was on track for its planned finish of 18/02/26, after which task 3.1 (initialize WMS application) would open with a planned start of 19/02/26.
## 5. Discussion and decisions
The Project Sponsor confirmed the requirements baseline and authorized development to begin on 19/02/26, once task 2.3 closes on 18/02/26. It was agreed that `main` would be the controlled integration baseline, that local configuration and secrets would be excluded from source control, and that progress would be reported per the Work Schedule task breakdown. No scope change was raised.
### Action items
| No. | Action | Owner | Target |
|---:|---|---|---|
| 1 | Initialize the application repository and baseline structure, starting 19/02/26 | Developer | 25/02/26 |
| 2 | Maintain progress reporting against the Work Schedule task IDs | Project Manager | Ongoing |
| 3 | Keep configuration and secrets out of version control | Developer | Ongoing |
### Next checkpoint
At the development baseline milestone.
## 6. Approval
### Prepared by
Name: Apirach Supattaratpateep
Role: Project Manager
Signature: ______________________________________________
Date: ___________________________________________________
### Technical evidence provided by
Name: Thanakorn Sathitwitayakul
Role: Developer
Signature: ______________________________________________
Date: ___________________________________________________
### Reviewed and authorized by
Name: Seri Viriyasakultorn
Project roles: Project Sponsor / Customer Representative / Authorized Approver
Position: Managing Director
Company: B.R.N. Enterprise Co., Ltd.
Signature: ______________________________________________
Date: ___________________________________________________
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
# Meeting Record — Stabilization Checkpoint
| Document field | Value |
|---|---|
| Document | Meeting Record |
| Meeting ID | MTG-003 |
| Project | BRN WMS |
| Project code | 200-WMS-26-001-00 |
| Phase | Stabilization |
| Meeting date | 03/08/26 |
| Related Progress Status Record | Progress Status Record 11 of 13 (reporting period 03/08/26) |
| Milestone | Post-development correction |
| Organizer | Apirach Supattaratpateep — Project Manager |
| Recorder | Apirach Supattaratpateep — Project Manager |
| Release | 03/08/26 V1.0 |
| Standard | ISO/IEC 29110 Basic Profile |
| Status | Final |
## 1. Purpose
This record documents the project checkpoint meeting held at the post-development correction milestone. It is the meeting counterpart to Progress Status Record 11 of 13; the task status and evidence reported here are the same as those recorded in that Progress Status Record.
**Implementation evidence for this checkpoint:** `b2c4374` — fix login and configurations
## 2. Participants
| No. | Name | Project role | Attendance |
|---:|---|---|---|
| 1 | Seri Viriyasakultorn | Project Sponsor / Customer Representative / Authorized Approver | Attended |
| 2 | Apirach Supattaratpateep | Project Manager | Attended |
| 3 | Noppong Chareunsook | System Analyst | Attended |
| 4 | Thanakorn Sathitwitayakul | Developer | Attended |
| 5 | Parin Ngamkham | QA / Tester | Attended |
| 6 | Yaowalak Bangchomphoo | Document Control | Attended |
Time and location were not recorded contemporaneously.
## 3. Agenda
| No. | Item |
|---:|---|
| 1 | Review the login and environment configuration corrections made after the development baseline |
| 2 | Review the status of verification, validation and documentation tasks |
| 3 | Confirm the plan for demonstration data and final delivery checks |
## 4. Project progress
Task 4.6 (configuration and login corrections) closed at 100% on its planned date of 03/08/26. Verification, validation and documentation tasks 4.3–4.5 remained in progress and were carried forward.
## 5. Discussion and decisions
The Developer reported that login and environment configuration issues identified after the development baseline had been corrected and committed. The meeting noted that the correction required linkage to the Correction Register and to verification evidence before closure. Verification and validation evidence consolidation was confirmed as the critical path to acceptance, and preparation of representative demonstration data was agreed as the next step.
### Action items
| No. | Action | Owner | Target |
|---:|---|---|---|
| 1 | Record the correction in the Correction Register and link it to verification evidence | Developer | Before acceptance |
| 2 | Prepare representative demonstration data for validation and handover | Developer / Tester | 14/08/26 |
| 3 | Complete consolidation of verification and validation evidence | Project Manager / QA | Before closure |
### Next checkpoint
At the closure preparation milestone.
## 6. Approval
### Prepared by
Name: Apirach Supattaratpateep
Role: Project Manager
Signature: ______________________________________________
Date: ___________________________________________________
### Technical evidence provided by
Name: Thanakorn Sathitwitayakul
Role: Developer
Signature: ______________________________________________
Date: ___________________________________________________
### Reviewed and authorized by
Name: Seri Viriyasakultorn
Project roles: Project Sponsor / Customer Representative / Authorized Approver
Position: Managing Director
Company: B.R.N. Enterprise Co., Ltd.
Signature: ______________________________________________
Date: ___________________________________________________