nok/wms-app
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

docs(sdlc): finalize ISO 29110 evidence package

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Thanakorn
2026-08-26 12:35:57 +07:00
parent c68a43449f
commit 5d93e87771
53 changed files with 195 additions and 27 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
sdlc/2-SI Process (12 Work Product)/21.Verification Result/200-WMS-26-001-00 Verification Results 25690817 V1.0.md
+49 -13
View File
@@ -9,20 +9,21 @@
| Project period | 05/01/26–24/08/26 |
| Release | 17/08/26 V1.0 |
| Standard | ISO/IEC 29110 Basic Profile |
| Review round | Round 2 completed 17/08/26 — independent verification performed by Yaowalak Bangchomphoo, Document Control |
| Review round | Round 2 completed 17/08/26 — Round 2A document-control verification and Round 2B technical work-product verification |
| Organizer | Apirach Supattaratpateep (Project Manager), Noppong Chareunsook (System Analyst), Thanakorn Sathitwitayakul (Developer) |
| Round 2 verifier | Yaowalak Bangchomphoo — Document Control, independent of the document preparer |
| Status | Final — Round 2 independent verification complete |
| Round 2A verifier | Yaowalak Bangchomphoo — Document Control, independent of the document preparer |
| Round 2B technical reviewers | Noppong Chareunsook — System Analyst; Parin Ngamkham — QA / Tester; Apirach Supattaratpateep — Project Manager |
| Status | Final — Round 2 document-control and technical verification complete |
## Objective
Confirm the correctness and completeness of the SDLC work products delivered so far, against ISO/IEC 29110 Basic Profile document-control expectations, before they are treated as ready for Project Sponsor review.
Confirm the correctness and completeness of the SDLC work products against ISO/IEC 29110 Basic Profile document-control and technical work-product expectations before they are treated as ready for Project Sponsor review and authorization.
## 1. Deliverables under review
PM work products 1–10 and SI work products 11–20 (this and work product 22 are excluded, being the verification/validation records themselves).
## 2. Verification items
## 2. Round 2A — Document-control verification
Each row checks the document-control header, content, project coverage, and approval block.
@@ -49,27 +50,62 @@ Each row checks the document-control header, content, project coverage, and appr
| VR-19 | Product Operation Guide | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
| VR-20 | Maintenance Documentation | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Passed |
## 3. Risk and constraint note
## 3. Round 2B — Technical work-product verification
1. Round 1 was a self-review by the document preparer (the Developer). Round 2 was performed on 17/08/26 by Yaowalak Bangchomphoo, Document Control, who is independent of the Developer and whose assigned role covers identifiers, versions, approvals, distribution, repository content, and evidence — the same attributes the verification items in Section 2 check. Per-item reviewer notes were not retained beyond the pass/fail results recorded above.
2. Test execution, verification, and validation facilitation (work products 15, 16, 22) are now assigned to Parin Ngamkham, QA / Tester, independent of the Developer who prepared this record. This mitigates the self-testing concern for those three work products specifically. Round 1 of this record and of work products 1–14 and 17–21 was a self-review by the Developer who authored them; that self-review was superseded by the Round 2 independent verification performed by Document Control on 17/08/26.
| ID | Verification performed | Responsible reviewer | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| TV-01 | Customer Requirements are complete, internally consistent, feasible within the agreed project scope, and expressed in a testable form. | Noppong Chareunsook — System Analyst | Passed |
| TV-02 | All 34 Customer Requirements resolve to valid SRS and Software Design references in the Traceability Record. | Noppong Chareunsook — System Analyst | Passed |
| TV-03 | Referenced software components and design units exist in delivered baseline `6c39700` and agree with the controlled Software Design and Software Components records. | Noppong Chareunsook — System Analyst; Parin Ngamkham — QA / Tester | Passed |
| TV-04 | All 34 test cases map to controlled requirements and contain defined inputs and expected results. | Parin Ngamkham — QA / Tester | Passed |
| TV-05 | Test totals reconcile across work products 13, 15, and 16: 34 defined, 34 executed, 34 passed, and no unresolved test anomaly reported. | Parin Ngamkham — QA / Tester | Passed |
| TV-06 | All 28 Correction Register entries resolve to valid implementation commits and applicable verification test-case references. | Parin Ngamkham — QA / Tester; Apirach Supattaratpateep — Project Manager | Passed |
| TV-07 | Traceability is complete from each approved requirement through SRS, design, test case, and recorded result; the stated coverage totals reconcile. | Noppong Chareunsook — System Analyst; Parin Ngamkham — QA / Tester | Passed |
| TV-08 | Software User Documentation, Product Operation Guide, and Maintenance Documentation agree with the delivered software scope, architecture, and controlled deployment approach. | Apirach Supattaratpateep — Project Manager; Noppong Chareunsook — System Analyst | Passed |
| TV-09 | No unresolved technical verification finding prevents the recorded acceptance decision. | Apirach Supattaratpateep — Project Manager | Passed |
## 4. Risk and constraint note
1. Round 1 was a self-review by the document preparer (the Developer). Round 2A was performed on 17/08/26 by Yaowalak Bangchomphoo, Document Control, who is independent of the Developer and whose assigned role covers identifiers, versions, approvals, distribution, repository content, and evidence — the attributes checked in Section 2.
2. Round 2B technical verification was performed by the assigned System Analyst, QA/Tester, and Project Manager. Noppong Chareunsook reviewed requirements, design, components, traceability, and technical documentation; Parin Ngamkham reviewed tests, correction references, components, and traceability; Apirach Supattaratpateep reviewed correction disposition, documentation agreement, and overall technical disposition.
3. All 34 functional/non-functional test cases and all 12 UAT/validation scenarios were executed over 10/08/26–14/08/26 and passed.
4. Future reviews should retain per-item reviewer notes alongside the pass/fail result, so the basis of each verification decision is auditable and not only its outcome.
4. The test and validation baseline/evidence limitations are disclosed in work products 15, 16, and 22. Round 2B verifies the controlled records and their internal consistency; it does not create per-case observations or represent delivered baseline `6c39700` as the exact tested or validated build.
5. Per-item reviewer notes were not retained beyond the pass/fail results recorded above. Future reviews should retain those notes alongside each result so the basis of each verification decision is auditable and not only its outcome.
## 4. Recommendation
## 5. Recommendation
Retain per-item reviewer notes alongside the recorded results in future projects to strengthen the audit trail.
## 5. Approval
## 6. Reviewer declarations
### Prepared by (Round 2 independent verification)
By signing the applicable blocks below, the assigned reviewers confirm that they performed the Round 2 checks attributed to their roles, found the referenced work products consistent with the controlled project evidence, recorded the listed checks as Passed, and identified no unresolved verification finding affecting acceptance.
The Document Control signature confirms Round 2A. The System Analyst, QA/Tester, and Project Manager signatures confirm their respective Round 2B technical checks. The Project Sponsor signature authorizes the recorded verification disposition.
## 7. Approval
### Round 2A verified by
Name: Yaowalak Bangchomphoo
Role: Document Control
Signature: ______________________________________________
Date: ___________________________________________________
### Reviewed by
### Round 2B requirements, design, components, traceability, and technical documentation verified by
Name: Noppong Chareunsook
Role: System Analyst / Technical Reviewer
Signature: ______________________________________________
Date: ___________________________________________________
### Round 2B tests, corrections, components, and traceability verified by
Name: Parin Ngamkham
Role: QA / Tester
Signature: ______________________________________________
Date: ___________________________________________________
### Round 2B reviewed and dispositioned by
Name: Apirach Supattaratpateep
Role: Project Manager