nok/wms-app
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

docs(sdlc): expand weak points in audit prep note

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Thanakorn
2026-10-02 08:23:11 +07:00
parent 46f334fe96
commit 53cd5c36e0
1 changed files with 6 additions and 6 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
sdlc/ISO29110-audit-prep.md
+6 -6
View File
@@ -29,9 +29,9 @@
### Weak points likely to be probed ### Weak points likely to be probed
| Point | How to prepare | | Point | What to show | What to say |
|---|---| |---|---|---|
| No change requests in 8 months | Explain why the evaluated items did not meet the change criteria | | No change requests in 8 months | Change Report parts 1–3; Minutes of Meeting 23 May (Rack → Bin), 3 Aug and 14 Aug (Task 4.7) | "Change control was used: 3 items were judged against the criteria and none qualified." Rehearse the advisor's test: "if we removed it, could we still deliver?" |
| All 45 test cases passed in one run | Point to the Correction Register: defects were found and fixed during development | | All 45 test cases passed in one run | Correction Register: 28 issues found and fixed during development, each linked to a commit and a test case; Test Case and Test Procedures pass rule: defects logged and retested until they pass | "The formal run came after the defects were fixed, so a clean run is the result of that work." If git history has real failing test runs, have one ready |
| Risks never re-rated | Be ready to show where risks were reviewed in Progress Status Records | | Risks never re-rated | Software Project Plan R1–R8; risk table in every Progress Status Record | Pick 1–2 risks that actually occurred (R1 → Rack/Bin decision; R7 → evidence prepared before UAT) and show where they were handled. Do not change ratings in the records now |
| Interviews must match the documents | Developer and QA rehearse: how a defect is logged; how TC-UN08.002 was run | | Interviews must match the documents | One rehearsal session with the three people | Developer: how a defect is logged (ISS-002 → commit `92d116f` → TC-UN08.002). QA: run TC-UN08.002 (rollback test). PM: trace CR13:001 → SR09:003 → UN08.002 → TC-UN08.002 → Passed in Test Report and Validation Results |